Non-Standard Employment in the BRICS Countries

Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44
E. Sychenko, M. Laruccia, D. Cusciano, I. Chikireva, J. Wang, P. Smit
{"title":"Non-Standard Employment in the BRICS Countries","authors":"E. Sychenko, M. Laruccia, D. Cusciano, I. Chikireva, J. Wang, P. Smit","doi":"10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-standardization of employment has become the main trend of the labour markets in the globalized economy. Attempting to enhance the flexibility of employment relations the legislators in BRICS countries are also the part of this trend. The forms of the nonstandard employment are numerous, the present paper concentrates upon the following ones: temporary employment, part-time and multi-party employment relationship. The authors review the experience of four BRICS countries in regulating non-standard forms of employment and determine what were the specific reasons for adopting them in Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa. The national parts are introduced by the consideration of the international standards of protection of employees working under non-standard contracts. It is argued that even though these four states did not ratify the ILO Convention No. 181 Private Employment Agencies Convention (1997) and only Russia ratified ILO Part-Time Work Convention (No. 175), the ILO approach has influenced the development of national regulations. Though the equal treatment of all workers is lacking in many aspects of employment relations. In the national parts the authors trace the changes in employment law which reflect the pursuit of flexibilization of the labour market and, as in Brazil, the need to formalize employment relations.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-standardization of employment has become the main trend of the labour markets in the globalized economy. Attempting to enhance the flexibility of employment relations the legislators in BRICS countries are also the part of this trend. The forms of the nonstandard employment are numerous, the present paper concentrates upon the following ones: temporary employment, part-time and multi-party employment relationship. The authors review the experience of four BRICS countries in regulating non-standard forms of employment and determine what were the specific reasons for adopting them in Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa. The national parts are introduced by the consideration of the international standards of protection of employees working under non-standard contracts. It is argued that even though these four states did not ratify the ILO Convention No. 181 Private Employment Agencies Convention (1997) and only Russia ratified ILO Part-Time Work Convention (No. 175), the ILO approach has influenced the development of national regulations. Though the equal treatment of all workers is lacking in many aspects of employment relations. In the national parts the authors trace the changes in employment law which reflect the pursuit of flexibilization of the labour market and, as in Brazil, the need to formalize employment relations.
分享
查看原文
金砖国家的非标准就业
就业不规范已成为全球化经济中劳动力市场的主要趋势。金砖国家立法者试图提高就业关系的灵活性也是这一趋势的一部分。非规范就业的形式多种多样,本文主要研究了临时性就业、非全日制就业和多党制就业三种形式。作者回顾了四个金砖国家在监管非标准就业形式方面的经验,并确定了俄罗斯、中国、巴西和南非采用非标准就业的具体原因。国家部分是考虑到保护在非标准合同下工作的雇员的国际标准而引入的。有人认为,尽管这四个国家没有批准国际劳工组织第181号《私人就业机构公约》(1997年),只有俄罗斯批准了国际劳工组织《兼职工作公约》(第175号),但国际劳工组织的做法影响了国家法规的制定。尽管在就业关系的许多方面缺乏对所有工人的平等待遇。在国家部分,作者追踪了就业法的变化,这些变化反映了对劳动力市场灵活性的追求,以及与巴西一样,正规化就业关系的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信