Competitive balance and demand for European men's football: a review of the literature

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Tsjalle van der Burg
{"title":"Competitive balance and demand for European men's football: a review of the literature","authors":"Tsjalle van der Burg","doi":"10.1080/23750472.2023.2206815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research question: In European men ’ s club football, competitive balance is decreasing. Review articles have concluded that the empirical studies do not provide a unanimous answer to the question whether this decrease leads to lower utility for the fans. This paper investigates whether the conclusion of the reviews is (still) correct. Research methods: Qualitative analysis is applied to get a better interpretation of the results of the empirical studies. Results and fi ndings: There are three types of uncertainty of outcome: short-term, seasonal, and long-term, with possible di ff erent dimensions within one type. A possible interpretation of the literature is the following: a decrease in one or two types of uncertainty of outcome, or a certain dimension, can lead to serious reductions in welfare, while the conclusion may be di ff erent for other types or dimensions. Several studies suggest that a decrease in (a certain type of) competitive balance has no e ff ect on welfare, or just a small e ff ect, if the competitive balance remains above some minimum level whereas once the competitive balance is below this level, further decreases in it result in serious welfare reductions. Taking these and other points into account, the review concludes that it is highly plausible that the present level of competitive balance is below the welfare-maximising level in most competitions at least, and any further decrease in it will seriously reduce welfare. Implications: Policies that improve competitive balance will plausibly also improve welfare. Research contribution: Compared to other review studies, this paper pays more attention to the reasons why di ff erent empirical studies get di ff erent results, which enables a less ambiguous conclusion.","PeriodicalId":45947,"journal":{"name":"Managing Sport and Leisure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Sport and Leisure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2023.2206815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question: In European men ’ s club football, competitive balance is decreasing. Review articles have concluded that the empirical studies do not provide a unanimous answer to the question whether this decrease leads to lower utility for the fans. This paper investigates whether the conclusion of the reviews is (still) correct. Research methods: Qualitative analysis is applied to get a better interpretation of the results of the empirical studies. Results and fi ndings: There are three types of uncertainty of outcome: short-term, seasonal, and long-term, with possible di ff erent dimensions within one type. A possible interpretation of the literature is the following: a decrease in one or two types of uncertainty of outcome, or a certain dimension, can lead to serious reductions in welfare, while the conclusion may be di ff erent for other types or dimensions. Several studies suggest that a decrease in (a certain type of) competitive balance has no e ff ect on welfare, or just a small e ff ect, if the competitive balance remains above some minimum level whereas once the competitive balance is below this level, further decreases in it result in serious welfare reductions. Taking these and other points into account, the review concludes that it is highly plausible that the present level of competitive balance is below the welfare-maximising level in most competitions at least, and any further decrease in it will seriously reduce welfare. Implications: Policies that improve competitive balance will plausibly also improve welfare. Research contribution: Compared to other review studies, this paper pays more attention to the reasons why di ff erent empirical studies get di ff erent results, which enables a less ambiguous conclusion.
欧洲男子足球的竞争平衡与需求:文献综述
研究问题:在欧洲男子俱乐部足球中,竞争平衡正在下降。评论文章得出的结论是,实证研究并没有提供一个一致的答案,是否这种减少导致较低的效用为球迷的问题。本文将探讨这些综述的结论是否正确。研究方法:采用定性分析,更好地解释实证研究的结果。结果和发现:结果的不确定性有三种类型:短期、季节性和长期,在一种类型中可能有不同的维度。对文献的一种可能的解释是:一种或两种类型的结果不确定性或某一维度的减少会导致福利的严重减少,而对其他类型或维度的结论可能不同。一些研究表明,(某种类型的)竞争平衡的减少对福利没有影响,或者只有很小的影响,如果竞争平衡保持在某个最低水平以上,而一旦竞争平衡低于这个水平,它的进一步减少会导致严重的福利减少。考虑到这些和其他几点,审查的结论是,至少在大多数竞争中,目前的竞争平衡水平低于福利最大化水平是非常合理的,任何进一步的下降都将严重减少福利。启示:改善竞争平衡的政策似乎也会改善福利。研究贡献:与其他综述研究相比,本文更关注不同实证研究得出不同结果的原因,从而减少了结论的模糊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Managing Sport and Leisure is a refereed journal that publishes high quality research articles to inform and stimulate discussions relevant to sport and leisure management globally. The journal is committed to publishing research that advances understanding of the practice of sport and leisure management in the public, voluntary and commercial sectors, internationally. It will appeal to anyone with a serious interest in contemporary sport and leisure management issues, including academics, managers, consultants, politicians and students. One of the key objectives of the journal is to provide a high level forum for communication between academics and practitioners of sport and leisure. Therefore Managing Sport and Leisure aims to be contemporary, integrated and, most importantly, relevant to practitioner training. Contributions are welcome and expected from both academics and practitioners throughout the international sport and leisure management community. In addition, the journal welcomes submissions from those investigating new and innovative areas of research and practice in sport and leisure management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信