A comparison of ISIS foreign fighters and supporters social media posts: an exploratory mixed-method content analysis

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Leevia Dillon, Loo Seng Neo, Joshua D. Freilich
{"title":"A comparison of ISIS foreign fighters and supporters social media posts: an exploratory mixed-method content analysis","authors":"Leevia Dillon, Loo Seng Neo, Joshua D. Freilich","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2019.1690544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper compares the social media posts of ISIS foreign fighters to those of ISIS supporters. We examine a random sample of social media posts made by violent foreign fighters (n = 14; 2000 posts) and non-violent supporters (n = 18; 2000 posts) of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) (overall n = 4,000 posts), from 2009 to 2015. We used a mixed-method study design. Our qualitative content analyses of the 4,000 posts identified five themes: Threats to in-group, societal grievances, pursuit for significance, religion, and commitment issues. Our quantitative comparisons found that the dominant themes in the foreign fighters’ online content were threats to in-group, societal grievances, and pursuit for significance, while religion and commitment issues were dominant themes in the supporters’ online content. We also identified thematic variations reflecting individual attitudes that emerged during the 2011–2015 period, when major geopolitical developments occurred in Syria and Iraq. Finally, our quantitative sentiment-based analysis found that the supporters (10 out of 18; 56%) posted more radical content than the foreign fighters (5 out of 14; 36%) on social media.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"12 1","pages":"268 - 291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2019.1690544","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2019.1690544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper compares the social media posts of ISIS foreign fighters to those of ISIS supporters. We examine a random sample of social media posts made by violent foreign fighters (n = 14; 2000 posts) and non-violent supporters (n = 18; 2000 posts) of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) (overall n = 4,000 posts), from 2009 to 2015. We used a mixed-method study design. Our qualitative content analyses of the 4,000 posts identified five themes: Threats to in-group, societal grievances, pursuit for significance, religion, and commitment issues. Our quantitative comparisons found that the dominant themes in the foreign fighters’ online content were threats to in-group, societal grievances, and pursuit for significance, while religion and commitment issues were dominant themes in the supporters’ online content. We also identified thematic variations reflecting individual attitudes that emerged during the 2011–2015 period, when major geopolitical developments occurred in Syria and Iraq. Finally, our quantitative sentiment-based analysis found that the supporters (10 out of 18; 56%) posted more radical content than the foreign fighters (5 out of 14; 36%) on social media.
ISIS外国战士和支持者社交媒体帖子的比较:探索性混合方法内容分析
摘要本文比较了ISIS外国战士和ISIS支持者在社交媒体上的帖子。我们随机抽取了外国暴力战士在社交媒体上发布的帖子样本(n = 14;2000个职位)和非暴力支持者(n = 18;2000个职位) = 4000个员额)。我们采用了混合方法研究设计。我们对4000个帖子的定性内容分析确定了五个主题:对群体内的威胁、社会不满、追求意义、宗教和承诺问题。我们的定量比较发现,外国战士在线内容中的主要主题是对群体内的威胁、社会不满和对意义的追求,而宗教和承诺问题是支持者在线内容中主要主题。我们还确定了反映2011-2015年期间出现的个人态度的主题变化,当时叙利亚和伊拉克发生了重大的地缘政治事态发展。最后,我们基于情绪的定量分析发现,支持者(18人中有10人;56%)在社交媒体上发布的内容比外国战士(14人中有5人;36%)更激进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信