Introduction to the Special Issue: Innovations and Current Challenges in Experimental Methods

IF 4.7 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Libby Jenke
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Innovations and Current Challenges in Experimental Methods","authors":"Libby Jenke","doi":"10.1017/pan.2021.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political science has increasingly embraced the experimental method to establish causal relationships suggested by theories and observational studies—from experiments’ traditional sub-disciplinary home, political psychology, to international relations. The most frequently voiced concern with experiments, qualms about their external validity in terms of sample, has been well documented and addressed (Coppock, Leeper, and Mullinix 2018; Krupnikov and Levine 2014; Krupnikov, Nam, and Style 2021; Lupton 2019; McDermott 2011; Mutz 2021). 1 Experiments uniquely provide scholars with the internal validity necessary to confidently identify causal effects, and issues with specific experiments tend to arise through errors of application by individual scholars rather than through any broad problems with the methodology.","PeriodicalId":48270,"journal":{"name":"Political Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Political science has increasingly embraced the experimental method to establish causal relationships suggested by theories and observational studies—from experiments’ traditional sub-disciplinary home, political psychology, to international relations. The most frequently voiced concern with experiments, qualms about their external validity in terms of sample, has been well documented and addressed (Coppock, Leeper, and Mullinix 2018; Krupnikov and Levine 2014; Krupnikov, Nam, and Style 2021; Lupton 2019; McDermott 2011; Mutz 2021). 1 Experiments uniquely provide scholars with the internal validity necessary to confidently identify causal effects, and issues with specific experiments tend to arise through errors of application by individual scholars rather than through any broad problems with the methodology.
特刊导论:实验方法的创新和当前挑战
政治学越来越多地采用实验方法来建立理论和观察研究提出的因果关系——从实验的传统分支学科,政治心理学,到国际关系。最常表达的对实验的关注,对样本的外部有效性的疑虑,已经得到了很好的记录和解决(Coppock, Leeper, and Mullinix 2018;Krupnikov and Levine 2014;Krupnikov, Nam, and Style 2021;勒普顿2019;麦克德莫特2011;Mutz 2021)。实验独特地为学者们提供了自信地确定因果关系所必需的内部效度,而具体实验的问题往往是由于个别学者的应用错误而产生的,而不是由于方法论上的任何广泛问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Analysis
Political Analysis POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Political Analysis chronicles these exciting developments by publishing the most sophisticated scholarship in the field. It is the place to learn new methods, to find some of the best empirical scholarship, and to publish your best research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信