Consolidating the European asylum regime’s coercive trajectory until the pandemic

IF 0.6 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
E. Comte
{"title":"Consolidating the European asylum regime’s coercive trajectory until the pandemic","authors":"E. Comte","doi":"10.24241/rcai.2021.129.3.131/en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How have European asylum policies developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspective of the long-term political trajectory of the European asylum regime? When the pandemic broke out, EU member states had for three decades been trying to resolve the shortcomings of the 1990 Dublin Convention. The weaknesses in the regime persisted both due to the overloading of frontline member states and the efforts to control secondary flows of asylum seekers within the EU. The pandemic has provided neither a hiatus nor a turning point in this regard but has produced a fluid situation that precipitated the United Kingdom’s withdrawal and the consolidation of the long-term trend of coercion of asylum seekers, between member states and at their external borders.","PeriodicalId":43375,"journal":{"name":"Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2021.129.3.131/en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How have European asylum policies developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspective of the long-term political trajectory of the European asylum regime? When the pandemic broke out, EU member states had for three decades been trying to resolve the shortcomings of the 1990 Dublin Convention. The weaknesses in the regime persisted both due to the overloading of frontline member states and the efforts to control secondary flows of asylum seekers within the EU. The pandemic has provided neither a hiatus nor a turning point in this regard but has produced a fluid situation that precipitated the United Kingdom’s withdrawal and the consolidation of the long-term trend of coercion of asylum seekers, between member states and at their external borders.
巩固欧洲庇护制度的强制性轨迹,直至大流行
从欧洲庇护制度的长期政治轨迹来看,2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,欧洲庇护政策是如何发展的?当流感大流行爆发时,欧盟成员国30年来一直在努力解决1990年《都柏林公约》的缺陷。这一制度的弱点持续存在,一方面是由于前线成员国的超载,另一方面是为了控制欧盟内部寻求庇护者的二次流动。在这方面,大流行病既没有中断,也没有转折点,而是造成了一种不稳定的局势,促使联合王国退出,并巩固了在成员国之间及其外部边界对寻求庇护者进行胁迫的长期趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals
Revista CIDOB d Afers Internationals INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信