Qualitative and value production of tree species in mixed spruce-fir-beech stands under the conditions of the Western Carpathians

IF 1.4 Q2 FORESTRY
I. Štefančík, R. Petráš, J. Mecko, J. Novák
{"title":"Qualitative and value production of tree species in mixed spruce-fir-beech stands under the conditions of the Western Carpathians","authors":"I. Štefančík, R. Petráš, J. Mecko, J. Novák","doi":"10.2478/forj-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Value production is one of the most important information for comparing different tree species composition and management strategies in forestry. Although the value production of forest stands is affected by various factors thinning can be considered as one of the most important one. This paper aims at the evaluation of qualitative and value production in mixed Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.), silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands, which were managed by crown thinning for a period of 44 to 50 years and/or left to self-development. More than 1,500 individual trees aged from 61 to 132 years from 15 subplots established in western part of the Low Tatras Mts. and the Great Fatra Mts. in Slovakia were assessed. The proportion of stems in the highest quality A (stem quality classes) reached a low percentage, i.e. 12% in beech, 28% in spruce and 13% in fir out of the number of evaluated trees. The percentage of the highest quality log classes (assortments I + II) of beech ranged from 0 to 23% and of coniferous ones from 2 to 12%. Regarding the management method used, this percentage accounted for 0.1 to 23% for plot with self-development, whereas in plots with tending it was from 1 to 23%. Value production of coniferous tree species was always higher compared to beech, regardless of the management method. Regarding individual tree species, we found the highest value production in fir (81.4 € m−3) and the lowest in beech (46.5 € m−3).","PeriodicalId":45042,"journal":{"name":"Central European Forestry Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"155 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Value production is one of the most important information for comparing different tree species composition and management strategies in forestry. Although the value production of forest stands is affected by various factors thinning can be considered as one of the most important one. This paper aims at the evaluation of qualitative and value production in mixed Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.), silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands, which were managed by crown thinning for a period of 44 to 50 years and/or left to self-development. More than 1,500 individual trees aged from 61 to 132 years from 15 subplots established in western part of the Low Tatras Mts. and the Great Fatra Mts. in Slovakia were assessed. The proportion of stems in the highest quality A (stem quality classes) reached a low percentage, i.e. 12% in beech, 28% in spruce and 13% in fir out of the number of evaluated trees. The percentage of the highest quality log classes (assortments I + II) of beech ranged from 0 to 23% and of coniferous ones from 2 to 12%. Regarding the management method used, this percentage accounted for 0.1 to 23% for plot with self-development, whereas in plots with tending it was from 1 to 23%. Value production of coniferous tree species was always higher compared to beech, regardless of the management method. Regarding individual tree species, we found the highest value production in fir (81.4 € m−3) and the lowest in beech (46.5 € m−3).
西喀尔巴阡山脉条件下云杉-冷杉-山毛榉混交林树种的质量和价值生产
摘要价值生产是比较林业不同树种组成和经营策略的重要信息之一。林分价值生产受到多种因素的影响,但间伐是影响林分价值生产的最重要因素之一。本文旨在评价混合挪威云杉(Picea abies)的质量和价值生产。[3]喀斯特、银杉(Abies alba Mill.)和欧洲山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica L.)林分,这些林分在44至50年的时间里通过树冠间伐和/或任由其自我发展来管理。在斯洛伐克的低塔特拉山脉西部和大法特拉山脉建立了15个子样地,对1500多棵年龄在61至132岁之间的树木进行了评估。在评价的树木中,最高质量A(茎质量等级)的比例较低,山毛榉为12%,云杉为28%,冷杉为13%。山毛榉最高质量原木类别(分类I + II)的百分比在0 ~ 23%之间,针叶林的百分比在2 ~ 12%之间。在管理方式上,自耕小区的这一比例为0.1 ~ 23%,抚育小区的这一比例为1 ~ 23%。无论采用何种管理方法,针叶树的价值生产始终高于山毛榉。就单个树种而言,我们发现冷杉的产值最高(81.4€m−3),山毛榉的产值最低(46.5€m−3)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
23
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Central European Forestry Journal (published as Lesnícky Èasopis - Forestry Journal until 2016) publishes novel science originating from research in forestry and related braches. Central European Forestry Journal is a professional peer-reviewed scientific journal published 4-time a year. The journal contains original papers and review papers of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry and related disciplines. The editorial office accepts the manuscripts within the focus of the journal exclusively in English language. The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges. Central European Forestry Journal, abbreviation: Cent. Eur. For. J., publishes original papers and review papers of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry and related scientific areas. The journal focuses on forestry issues relevant for Europe, primarily Central European regions. Original works and review papers can be submitted only in English language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信