Synthetic Attributes and the Schematized Categories

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI:10.1017/S1369415422000462

Maximilian Edwards

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Within Kant scholarship, there is an entrenched tendency to distinguish, on Kant’s behalf, between pure and ‘schematized’ categories. There is also a widespread tendency to view the schematized categories as conceptually richer than the pure categories. I argue that this reading of the distinction, which I call the standard view, should be rejected. In its place, I draw on a neglected part of Kant’s theory of marks – namely, his account of ‘synthetic attributes’ – to propose an account of the distinction that preserves a strict identity between pure and schematized categories at the level of analysable content.

查看原文本刊更多论文

综合属性和图式分类

摘要在康德学术中，有一种根深蒂固的倾向，即代表康德区分纯粹的和“图式化”的类别。还有一种普遍的趋势是，认为模式化的类别在概念上比纯类别更丰富。我认为，这种对区别的解读，我称之为标准观点，应该被拒绝。取而代之的是，我借鉴了康德标记理论中被忽视的一部分，即他对“合成属性”的描述，提出了一种对在可分析内容层面上保持纯粹类别和图式类别之间严格一致性的区别的描述。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.