Digitalization between environmental activism and counter-activism: The case of satellite data on deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
M. Cecilia Oliveira , Leandro Siqueira
{"title":"Digitalization between environmental activism and counter-activism: The case of satellite data on deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon","authors":"M. Cecilia Oliveira ,&nbsp;Leandro Siqueira","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analyzes the uses of digital satellite data on deforestation in the Amazon region, drawing on poststructuralist studies of scientific knowledge practices and Science and Technology Studies (STS). Focusing on changes under the government of President Jair Bolsonaro, we argue that populist right-wing rhetoric, policies, and practices towards deforestation in the Amazon must be understood in the context of a broad and sophisticated effort to discredit and dismantle pre-existing knowledge infrastructures and <em>transparency</em> regime. These structures had developed over time with the aim of making deforestation visible and manageable. The dismantling of these structures is part of the effort to establish a competing <em>alethurgy</em>, i.e an assemblage of procedures and rituals that claim to manifest the “truth” about the Amazon. This new alethurgy depends, crucially, on a regime of <em>hypertransparency</em> which enables practices of environmental <em>counter-activism.</em> This new alethurgy promotes an extractivist use of the Amazon in which deforestation is an acceptable price to pay for economic development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000040/pdfft?md5=e848a41e40178823206ee3ae9fa34f80&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000040-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper analyzes the uses of digital satellite data on deforestation in the Amazon region, drawing on poststructuralist studies of scientific knowledge practices and Science and Technology Studies (STS). Focusing on changes under the government of President Jair Bolsonaro, we argue that populist right-wing rhetoric, policies, and practices towards deforestation in the Amazon must be understood in the context of a broad and sophisticated effort to discredit and dismantle pre-existing knowledge infrastructures and transparency regime. These structures had developed over time with the aim of making deforestation visible and manageable. The dismantling of these structures is part of the effort to establish a competing alethurgy, i.e an assemblage of procedures and rituals that claim to manifest the “truth” about the Amazon. This new alethurgy depends, crucially, on a regime of hypertransparency which enables practices of environmental counter-activism. This new alethurgy promotes an extractivist use of the Amazon in which deforestation is an acceptable price to pay for economic development.

环境行动主义和反行动主义之间的数字化:巴西亚马逊森林砍伐的卫星数据案例
本文利用科学知识实践和科学技术研究(STS)的后结构主义研究,分析了亚马逊地区森林砍伐数字卫星数据的使用情况。关注雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)总统政府领导下的变革,我们认为,必须在广泛而复杂的努力中理解民粹主义右翼对亚马逊森林砍伐的言论、政策和做法,以诋毁和拆除已有的知识基础设施和透明度制度。这些结构是随着时间的推移而发展起来的,目的是使森林砍伐变得可见和可管理。拆除这些结构是努力建立一种竞争性的谬论的一部分,即一系列程序和仪式,声称能体现关于亚马逊的“真相”。至关重要的是,这种新的理论依赖于一种高度透明的制度,这种制度使环境反激进主义的实践成为可能。这种新的谬论促进了对亚马逊雨林的开采,在这种情况下,砍伐森林是为经济发展付出的可接受的代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信