The Freedom from Self-Incrimination—A Strasbourg-Proof Approach? Cases C-466/19 P Qualcomm and C-481/19 P DB v Consob

IF 1.1 Q2 LAW
M. Veenbrink
{"title":"The Freedom from Self-Incrimination—A Strasbourg-Proof Approach? Cases C-466/19 P Qualcomm and C-481/19 P DB v Consob","authors":"M. Veenbrink","doi":"10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.o rg/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2021 CURRENT INTELLIGENCE 1","PeriodicalId":51907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JECLAP/LPAB045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.o rg/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2021 CURRENT INTELLIGENCE 1
自证其罪的自由——斯特拉斯堡证明的方法?案例c -466/ 19p高通和c -481/ 19p DB诉Consob
这是一篇开放获取的文章,根据知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可证的条款分发(http://creativecommons.org/licents/by-nc nd/4.0/),允许在任何媒体上对作品进行非商业性复制和分发,前提是原始作品没有以任何方式进行更改或转换,并且作品被适当引用。如需商业重复使用,请联系journals.permissions@oup.com《欧洲竞争法与实践杂志》,2021当前情报1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信