The Relationship Between Self-treatment of Genital Infection and Ectopic Pregnancy

Q3 Nursing
S. Parvinroo, S. Sharami, Ariadokht Ardeshiri, M. Shakiba, Soodabeh Ebrahimi
{"title":"The Relationship Between Self-treatment of Genital Infection and Ectopic Pregnancy","authors":"S. Parvinroo, S. Sharami, Ariadokht Ardeshiri, M. Shakiba, Soodabeh Ebrahimi","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.32.4.2226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the contributing factors in ectopic pregnancy is genital infection. The self-treatment of genital infections is a common practice that results in infectious diseases, microbial resistance, and no patient recovery. Objective: This study aimed to determine the relationship between the self-treatment of genital infection and ectopic pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was performed on 373 women in 2018. Samples included 180 normal pregnant women (the control group) and 193 women with ectopic pregnancies with histories of genital infections (the case group). The samples were selected by a convenient sampling method. The study data were collected by a researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic questions and 36 questions about self-treatment of genital infections, drug type, and reasons to use self-medication. Descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, and the logistic regression model were used to analyze the obtained data. Results: In the present study, 373 eligible people were included. The mean ± SD age of women with ectopic pregnancies (the case group) was 33.37 ± 4 years and of women with normal pregnancy (the control group) was 33.21 ± 3.18 years. The frequency of ectopic pregnancy in women over 35 years was higher than that in women with normal pregnancies. The frequency of individuals who used self-medication to eliminate the vaginal infection in the control group and the case group were 76.7% and 48.9%, respectively. The frequency of individuals who used traditional methods (washing the vagina with ice or baking soda was 64.39% with the highest percentage), and 115 women (35.6%) used chemical methods (vaginal douching with the highest percentage). Self-medication was independently associated with higher odds of ectopic pregnancy (OR = 2.227, 95%CI; 1.316-3.769, p= 0.003). Conclusion: The results of this study show that self-medication for vaginal infections can be a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, the community should be educated to avoid the self-medication of genital infections.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.32.4.2226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One of the contributing factors in ectopic pregnancy is genital infection. The self-treatment of genital infections is a common practice that results in infectious diseases, microbial resistance, and no patient recovery. Objective: This study aimed to determine the relationship between the self-treatment of genital infection and ectopic pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was performed on 373 women in 2018. Samples included 180 normal pregnant women (the control group) and 193 women with ectopic pregnancies with histories of genital infections (the case group). The samples were selected by a convenient sampling method. The study data were collected by a researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic questions and 36 questions about self-treatment of genital infections, drug type, and reasons to use self-medication. Descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, and the logistic regression model were used to analyze the obtained data. Results: In the present study, 373 eligible people were included. The mean ± SD age of women with ectopic pregnancies (the case group) was 33.37 ± 4 years and of women with normal pregnancy (the control group) was 33.21 ± 3.18 years. The frequency of ectopic pregnancy in women over 35 years was higher than that in women with normal pregnancies. The frequency of individuals who used self-medication to eliminate the vaginal infection in the control group and the case group were 76.7% and 48.9%, respectively. The frequency of individuals who used traditional methods (washing the vagina with ice or baking soda was 64.39% with the highest percentage), and 115 women (35.6%) used chemical methods (vaginal douching with the highest percentage). Self-medication was independently associated with higher odds of ectopic pregnancy (OR = 2.227, 95%CI; 1.316-3.769, p= 0.003). Conclusion: The results of this study show that self-medication for vaginal infections can be a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, the community should be educated to avoid the self-medication of genital infections.
生殖器感染的自我治疗与异位妊娠的关系
外阴感染是宫外孕发生的重要因素之一。生殖器感染的自我治疗是一种常见做法,导致传染病、微生物耐药性和患者无法康复。目的:探讨生殖道感染自我治疗与异位妊娠的关系。材料与方法:本病例对照研究于2018年对373名女性进行了研究。样本包括180名正常孕妇(对照组)和193名有生殖器感染史的异位妊娠妇女(病例组)。采用方便的抽样方法选择样品。研究数据是通过一份调查问卷收集的,其中包含人口统计问题和36个关于生殖器感染的自我治疗、药物类型和使用自我药物的原因的问题。采用描述性统计、卡方检验和logistic回归模型对所得数据进行分析。结果:本研究纳入373名符合条件的受试者。异位妊娠妇女(病例组)的平均±SD年龄为33.37±4岁,正常妊娠妇女(对照组)的平均±SD年龄为33.21±3.18岁。35岁以上妇女异位妊娠的发生率高于正常妊娠妇女。对照组和病例组使用自我药疗消除阴道感染的比例分别为76.7%和48.9%。使用传统方法(冰或小苏打清洗阴道)的女性占64.39%,所占比例最高;使用化学方法(阴道冲洗)的女性占115人,所占比例最高,占35.6%。自我用药与宫外孕的高发生率独立相关(OR = 2.227, 95%CI;1.316-3.769, p= 0.003)。结论:本研究结果表明,阴道感染的自我药物治疗可能是异位妊娠的一个危险因素。因此,应教育社会避免生殖器感染的自我药疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信