Charcterization of COVID-19 hospitalized adult patients, vaccinated vs non-vaccinated in Duhok province

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Paiman Abdulsalam Mohammed, Muayad Aghali Merza
{"title":"Charcterization of COVID-19 hospitalized adult patients, vaccinated vs non-vaccinated in Duhok province","authors":"Paiman Abdulsalam Mohammed, Muayad Aghali Merza","doi":"10.22317/jcms.v8i6.1272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: First, to determine prevalence of vaccinated COVID-19 patients among hospitalized patients; Second, to determine the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 patients.\nMethods: The study was carried out on 300 adult COVID-19 hospitalized patients at Duhok COVID-19 health facilities. A prospective cross-sectional study was used as the study design. Between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, all patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled.\nResults:  The majority of people in this study were unvaccinated. Pfizer was most popular among people who had received vaccination. The majority of hospitalized patients were old ages, the mean age was 60.73 ± 15.83 yr. In our study, the unvaccinated females had higher infection rates while vaccinated males had higher hospital admission rates. In our study, vaccinated patients had shorter hospital duration stays. In both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, predominated cases were severe cases. D dimer was significantly higher among vaccinated patients. The mortality rate was relatively high among both groups. Patients who had received vaccinations tended to experience vomiting and flu-like symptoms more frequently than those who had not. In terms of comorbidities, smoking and malignancy were significant risk factors for COVID-19 infection in unvaccinated patients.\nConclusion: We looked at 300 COVID-19 hospitalized patients. In this study, the majority of people were unvaccinated. Pfizer, had higher prevalence among vaccinated individuals. Majority were elderly. The unvaccinated cases had a higher rate of female hospital admissions than male. The D.Dimer level was significantly different between the two groups. Vomiting and flu-like illness showed higher prevalence in vaccinated cases with significant difference. Smoking and malignancy were significant risk factors for COVID-19 infection in unvaccinated patients. In the fight against a public health disaster like a COVID-19 pandemic, the availability of a COVID-19 vaccines campaign are crucial.","PeriodicalId":42860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v8i6.1272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: First, to determine prevalence of vaccinated COVID-19 patients among hospitalized patients; Second, to determine the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 patients. Methods: The study was carried out on 300 adult COVID-19 hospitalized patients at Duhok COVID-19 health facilities. A prospective cross-sectional study was used as the study design. Between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, all patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled. Results:  The majority of people in this study were unvaccinated. Pfizer was most popular among people who had received vaccination. The majority of hospitalized patients were old ages, the mean age was 60.73 ± 15.83 yr. In our study, the unvaccinated females had higher infection rates while vaccinated males had higher hospital admission rates. In our study, vaccinated patients had shorter hospital duration stays. In both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, predominated cases were severe cases. D dimer was significantly higher among vaccinated patients. The mortality rate was relatively high among both groups. Patients who had received vaccinations tended to experience vomiting and flu-like symptoms more frequently than those who had not. In terms of comorbidities, smoking and malignancy were significant risk factors for COVID-19 infection in unvaccinated patients. Conclusion: We looked at 300 COVID-19 hospitalized patients. In this study, the majority of people were unvaccinated. Pfizer, had higher prevalence among vaccinated individuals. Majority were elderly. The unvaccinated cases had a higher rate of female hospital admissions than male. The D.Dimer level was significantly different between the two groups. Vomiting and flu-like illness showed higher prevalence in vaccinated cases with significant difference. Smoking and malignancy were significant risk factors for COVID-19 infection in unvaccinated patients. In the fight against a public health disaster like a COVID-19 pandemic, the availability of a COVID-19 vaccines campaign are crucial.
新冠肺炎住院成年患者的特征,杜霍省接种疫苗与未接种疫苗的患者
目的:首先,确定住院患者中接种新冠肺炎疫苗的患者的患病率;第二,确定接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的新冠肺炎患者的流行病学、临床和实验室特征。方法:对杜霍克新冠肺炎卫生机构300名成年新冠肺炎住院患者进行研究。采用前瞻性横断面研究作为研究设计。2021年10月1日至2022年3月31日期间,所有经PCR证实的新冠肺炎患者均入选。结果:本研究中的大多数人未接种疫苗。辉瑞在接种过疫苗的人群中最受欢迎。大多数住院患者为老年人,平均年龄为60.73±15.83岁。在我们的研究中,未接种疫苗的女性感染率较高,而接种疫苗的男性住院率较高。在我们的研究中,接种疫苗的患者住院时间更短。在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者中,主要病例为重症病例。D二聚体在接种疫苗的患者中显著升高。两组的死亡率都相对较高。接种过疫苗的患者往往比未接种疫苗的患者更频繁地出现呕吐和流感样症状。就合并症而言,吸烟和恶性肿瘤是未接种疫苗患者感染新冠肺炎的重要危险因素。结论:我们观察了300名新冠肺炎住院患者。在这项研究中,大多数人没有接种疫苗。辉瑞在接种疫苗的人群中的患病率较高。大多数是老年人。未接种疫苗的女性住院率高于男性。D.二聚体水平在两组之间有显著差异。在接种疫苗的病例中,呕吐和流感样疾病的患病率较高,具有显著差异。吸烟和恶性肿瘤是未接种疫苗患者感染新冠肺炎的重要危险因素。在抗击新冠肺炎大流行等公共卫生灾难的斗争中,新冠肺炎疫苗运动的可用性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences
Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信