Moving Mountains and Uprooting Weeds: Literary Subjectivity, First Wave Feminism, and Women's Magazines in Latin America and Japan

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Amy C. Obermeyer
{"title":"Moving Mountains and Uprooting Weeds: Literary Subjectivity, First Wave Feminism, and Women's Magazines in Latin America and Japan","authors":"Amy C. Obermeyer","doi":"10.1353/fem.2022.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues that first-wave feminism is best understood as a relatively concurrent, multipolar irruption of women's claims to subjectivity wherein suffrage was not the main objective, but rather just one particular historically contingent outcome among many. It seeks to overturn models that understand early feminism as a Euro-American phenomenon to which women in the so-called third world or non-western world were latecomers. In a close reading of the Argentine literary journal Búcaro Americano (1896-1908) headed by established author Clorinda Matto de Turner and Japan's Seitō (1911-1916), a feminist literary journal headed by up-an-coming author and feminist Hiratsuka Raichō, I trace the specific articulations of subjectivity proffered by the journals' writers and editors. Specifically, I find that the specific subjectivity evinced by the women producing these journals was a fundamentally internationalized one owing on the one hand to the economic changes to the global economy wrought by liberalism and on the other to women's exclusion from national discourse by both law and custom. Ultimately, I argue that by understanding these texts as part of larger feminist movement that arose contemporaneously in multiple locations around the world, a more holistic and less imperialist view of first-wave feminism becomes apparent.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"850 - 879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article argues that first-wave feminism is best understood as a relatively concurrent, multipolar irruption of women's claims to subjectivity wherein suffrage was not the main objective, but rather just one particular historically contingent outcome among many. It seeks to overturn models that understand early feminism as a Euro-American phenomenon to which women in the so-called third world or non-western world were latecomers. In a close reading of the Argentine literary journal Búcaro Americano (1896-1908) headed by established author Clorinda Matto de Turner and Japan's Seitō (1911-1916), a feminist literary journal headed by up-an-coming author and feminist Hiratsuka Raichō, I trace the specific articulations of subjectivity proffered by the journals' writers and editors. Specifically, I find that the specific subjectivity evinced by the women producing these journals was a fundamentally internationalized one owing on the one hand to the economic changes to the global economy wrought by liberalism and on the other to women's exclusion from national discourse by both law and custom. Ultimately, I argue that by understanding these texts as part of larger feminist movement that arose contemporaneously in multiple locations around the world, a more holistic and less imperialist view of first-wave feminism becomes apparent.
移山拔草:文学主体性、第一波女性主义与拉丁美洲和日本的女性杂志
摘要:本文认为,第一波女权主义最好被理解为女性主体性主张的相对同时的多极爆发,其中选举权不是主要目标,而只是众多目标中的一个特定的历史偶然结果。它试图推翻那些将早期女权主义理解为欧美现象的模式,即所谓的第三世界或非西方世界的女性是后来者。在仔细阅读由知名作家Clorinda Matto de Turner领导的阿根廷文学杂志《Búcaro Americano》(1896年-1908年)和由后起之秀作家、女权主义者Hiratsuka Raichō领导的女权主义文学杂志《Seitō;》(1911-1916年)时,我追溯了这些杂志的作者和编辑对主体性的具体阐述。具体而言,我发现,制作这些期刊的女性所表现出的特定主观性从根本上是国际化的,一方面是由于自由主义对全球经济的经济变化,另一方面是因为法律和习俗将女性排除在国家话语之外。最终,我认为,通过将这些文本理解为同时在世界多个地方兴起的更大规模女权主义运动的一部分,对第一波女权主义的更全面、更少帝国主义的看法变得显而易见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信