A framework for assessing quality of tender documents

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
N. Govender, S. Laryea, R. Watermeyer
{"title":"A framework for assessing quality of tender documents","authors":"N. Govender, S. Laryea, R. Watermeyer","doi":"10.1108/bepam-07-2021-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSeveral researchers in the construction industry have mentioned that quality of tender documents is declining without tangibly assessing quality. Similarly, in practice, no standardised instrument exists to assess tender document quality. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to develop a framework to assess the quality of tender documents produced by built environment professionals in the construction industry. A framework was chosen to address the gaps in theory and practice as it provides a flexible but structured mechanism to assess tender document quality.Design/methodology/approachThe research methodology contained three stages, namely: multi-investigator triangulation, a workshop with infrastructure experts and framework development and validation. A consolidated list of key quality indicators was developed following the literature review and multi-investigator triangulation. The indicators were discussed with ten experts in the South African construction industry, who were responsible for validating and providing insight on whether additional indicators were required. This informed development of the framework.FindingsThis paper proposes a framework to assess tender document quality by evaluating six key quality indicators namely: accuracy, clarity, completeness, standardisation, relevance and certainty.Research limitations/implicationsThe framework is limited to the assessment of tender document quality in the construction industry and is suited to the “Design by Employer” contracting strategy. From an academic perspective, this paper provides researchers with a framework to measure and benchmark quality of tender documents in future studies.Practical implicationsThis framework can be used by clients to continuously assess and benchmark quality of tender documents produced by professionals.Originality/valueA comprehensive and standardised approach to assess tender document quality was not available in the construction literature or the construction industry. Therefore, this paper addressed this gap in knowledge, by providing consumers (clients and contractors) of tender documents and researchers a mechanism to assess quality.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-07-2021-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSeveral researchers in the construction industry have mentioned that quality of tender documents is declining without tangibly assessing quality. Similarly, in practice, no standardised instrument exists to assess tender document quality. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to develop a framework to assess the quality of tender documents produced by built environment professionals in the construction industry. A framework was chosen to address the gaps in theory and practice as it provides a flexible but structured mechanism to assess tender document quality.Design/methodology/approachThe research methodology contained three stages, namely: multi-investigator triangulation, a workshop with infrastructure experts and framework development and validation. A consolidated list of key quality indicators was developed following the literature review and multi-investigator triangulation. The indicators were discussed with ten experts in the South African construction industry, who were responsible for validating and providing insight on whether additional indicators were required. This informed development of the framework.FindingsThis paper proposes a framework to assess tender document quality by evaluating six key quality indicators namely: accuracy, clarity, completeness, standardisation, relevance and certainty.Research limitations/implicationsThe framework is limited to the assessment of tender document quality in the construction industry and is suited to the “Design by Employer” contracting strategy. From an academic perspective, this paper provides researchers with a framework to measure and benchmark quality of tender documents in future studies.Practical implicationsThis framework can be used by clients to continuously assess and benchmark quality of tender documents produced by professionals.Originality/valueA comprehensive and standardised approach to assess tender document quality was not available in the construction literature or the construction industry. Therefore, this paper addressed this gap in knowledge, by providing consumers (clients and contractors) of tender documents and researchers a mechanism to assess quality.
评估招标文件质量的框架
目的建筑行业的几位研究人员提到,在没有切实评估质量的情况下,招标文件的质量正在下降。同样,在实践中,不存在评估招标文件质量的标准化工具。因此,本文的目的是制定一个框架来评估建筑业建筑环境专业人员编制的招标文件的质量。选择了一个框架来解决理论和实践上的差距,因为它提供了一个灵活但结构化的机制来评估招标文件质量。设计/方法论/方法论研究方法论包括三个阶段,即:多研究者三角测量、与基础设施专家的研讨会以及框架开发和验证。在文献综述和多研究者三角测量之后,制定了一份关键质量指标的综合清单。与南非建筑业的十位专家讨论了这些指标,他们负责验证并深入了解是否需要额外的指标。这为框架的发展提供了信息。结果本文提出了一个通过评估六个关键质量指标来评估招标文件质量的框架,即:准确性、清晰度、完整性、标准化、相关性和确定性。研究局限性/含义该框架仅限于评估建筑行业的招标文件质量,适用于“业主设计”承包策略。从学术角度来看,本文为研究人员在未来的研究中衡量和基准招标文件质量提供了一个框架。实际含义客户可以使用该框架来持续评估和衡量专业人员编制的招标文件的质量。独创性/价值建筑文献或建筑行业中没有评估招标文件质量的全面标准化方法。因此,本文通过向招标文件的消费者(客户和承包商)和研究人员提供一种评估质量的机制来解决这一知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信