When diplomacy is more harmful to human rights than conflict: the effects of America's deal with the Taliban

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Shuja Jamal
{"title":"When diplomacy is more harmful to human rights than conflict: the effects of America's deal with the Taliban","authors":"Shuja Jamal","doi":"10.1080/1323238x.2022.2135168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The US-Taliban deal of February 2020 preceded the violent return to power of the Taliban and the concomitant deterioration of human rights and development gains in Afghanistan. In this article, the author contends that the worsening situation in Afghanistan is largely the logical and inevitable consequence of this deal. The author, who is a former Afghan official involved in efforts during the negotiation and implementation of the deal, draws on his observations to argue that by excluding the preservation of human rights and development gains, the deal made it practically more difficult for the then-government of Afghanistan and its international partners to protect the fundamental rights of the people of Afghanistan. The lesson from the US-Taliban deal is that unless human rights priorities are embedded in peace diplomacy efforts, they could lead to adverse outcomes for millions of people.","PeriodicalId":37430,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2022.2135168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The US-Taliban deal of February 2020 preceded the violent return to power of the Taliban and the concomitant deterioration of human rights and development gains in Afghanistan. In this article, the author contends that the worsening situation in Afghanistan is largely the logical and inevitable consequence of this deal. The author, who is a former Afghan official involved in efforts during the negotiation and implementation of the deal, draws on his observations to argue that by excluding the preservation of human rights and development gains, the deal made it practically more difficult for the then-government of Afghanistan and its international partners to protect the fundamental rights of the people of Afghanistan. The lesson from the US-Taliban deal is that unless human rights priorities are embedded in peace diplomacy efforts, they could lead to adverse outcomes for millions of people.
当外交对人权的危害比冲突更大时:美国与塔利班协议的影响
摘要2020年2月,美国与塔利班达成协议,此前塔利班暴力重新掌权,阿富汗人权和发展成果随之恶化。在这篇文章中,作者认为,阿富汗局势的恶化在很大程度上是这项协议合乎逻辑和不可避免的结果。提交人是一名前阿富汗官员,参与了该协议的谈判和执行工作。他根据自己的意见认为,通过排除维护人权和发展成果,该协议实际上使当时的阿富汗政府及其国际伙伴更难保护阿富汗人民的基本权利。美国与塔利班协议的教训是,除非将人权优先事项纳入和平外交努力,否则可能会给数百万人带来不利后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Human Rights
Australian Journal of Human Rights Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Human Rights (AJHR) is Australia’s first peer reviewed journal devoted exclusively to human rights development in Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and internationally. The journal aims to raise awareness of human rights issues in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region by providing a forum for scholarship and discussion. The AJHR examines legal aspects of human rights, along with associated philosophical, historical, economic and political considerations, across a range of issues, including aboriginal ownership of land, racial discrimination and vilification, human rights in the criminal justice system, children’s rights, homelessness, immigration, asylum and detention, corporate accountability, disability standards and free speech.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信