RESOURCES OF NEOTRADITIONALISM IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

Хопёрская Лариса Львовна
{"title":"RESOURCES OF NEOTRADITIONALISM IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC","authors":"Хопёрская Лариса Львовна","doi":"10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-2-60-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article substantiates the thesis that the classical constitutional and legal analysis does not allow to satisfactorily explain the legal and political processes taking place in the post-Soviet period in the Kyrgyz Republic. Their comprehension is carried out within the framework of the political-anthropological approach. The review of numerous editions of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic shows the formation of a conceptual and regulatory framework for neotraditionalization, within which national traditions are considered as the basis for the development of the state. The process of institutionalization of relations built on the principles of traditional values through the inclusion of the People's Kurultai and kurultais of local communities in the political system of the Kyrgyz Republic is characterized. The conclusion is substantiated that in the presence of a tendency to introduce a pro-Western model of democratization, attempts to maintain a pro-Russian orientation, there is a strengthening of the ideology and practice of neotraditionalism. This suggests that further constitutional and legal processes in the Kyrgyz Republic will develop along their own trajectory.","PeriodicalId":33262,"journal":{"name":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-2-60-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article substantiates the thesis that the classical constitutional and legal analysis does not allow to satisfactorily explain the legal and political processes taking place in the post-Soviet period in the Kyrgyz Republic. Their comprehension is carried out within the framework of the political-anthropological approach. The review of numerous editions of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic shows the formation of a conceptual and regulatory framework for neotraditionalization, within which national traditions are considered as the basis for the development of the state. The process of institutionalization of relations built on the principles of traditional values through the inclusion of the People's Kurultai and kurultais of local communities in the political system of the Kyrgyz Republic is characterized. The conclusion is substantiated that in the presence of a tendency to introduce a pro-Western model of democratization, attempts to maintain a pro-Russian orientation, there is a strengthening of the ideology and practice of neotraditionalism. This suggests that further constitutional and legal processes in the Kyrgyz Republic will develop along their own trajectory.
新传统主义在吉尔吉斯共和国宪法和法律程序中的资源
本文证实了经典的宪法和法律分析不能令人满意地解释后苏联时期吉尔吉斯共和国的法律和政治进程的论点。他们的理解是在政治人类学方法的框架内进行的。对众多版本的吉尔吉斯共和国宪法的回顾表明,新传统化形成了一个概念和监管框架,在这个框架内,民族传统被视为国家发展的基础。在传统价值原则的基础上,通过将人民库鲁勒泰人和地方社区的库鲁勒泰人纳入吉尔吉斯共和国的政治制度,使关系制度化。结论证明,在引入亲西方的民主化模式、试图维持亲俄倾向的趋势下,新传统主义的意识形态和实践正在加强。这表明吉尔吉斯共和国的进一步宪法和法律进程将沿着自己的轨迹发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信