The Effect of Scientific Terms Error on Scientific Communication of Prospective Teachers and Progressive Education

P. Parmin, S. D. Pamelasari, S. Rahayu
{"title":"The Effect of Scientific Terms Error on Scientific Communication of Prospective Teachers and Progressive Education","authors":"P. Parmin, S. D. Pamelasari, S. Rahayu","doi":"10.23917/IJOLAE.V3I3.14214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The error of term usage in communication can be caused due to the misunderstanding of the words' mean-ing, or even the users might even realize their error but somehow keep using it deliberately. Thus, this study was conducted to find errors in using scientific terms in communication that influence the scientific communication of prospective science teachers. The research design used was mixed methods with sequen-tial explanatory strategies. The data were gathered through a closed questionnaire referring to the optional Likert Scale of 5 options and analyzed quantitatively. There were 256 participants or prospective science teachers as research subjects. The mean of the r count was 0.64, and the r table was 0.12. Therefore, it was judged as valid. The reliability test was obtained by Cronbach's Alpha of 0.951 0.80. The results show that there were 13 errors of scientific terms performed by participants. Wilcoxon test obtained the Asymp value. Sig. of 0,000 0.005 meaning that there were differences in the use of the term science in society and university. Representing and presenting were two aspects of scientific communication, with 40% obtain-ing moderate criteria. The research concludes that the scientific terms' error affects prospective teachers' sci-entific communication and progressive education since the errors have become a long habit. It must be over-come because the habit scientifically will also influence the trust of scientific truth.","PeriodicalId":34584,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education IJOLAE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education IJOLAE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/IJOLAE.V3I3.14214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The error of term usage in communication can be caused due to the misunderstanding of the words' mean-ing, or even the users might even realize their error but somehow keep using it deliberately. Thus, this study was conducted to find errors in using scientific terms in communication that influence the scientific communication of prospective science teachers. The research design used was mixed methods with sequen-tial explanatory strategies. The data were gathered through a closed questionnaire referring to the optional Likert Scale of 5 options and analyzed quantitatively. There were 256 participants or prospective science teachers as research subjects. The mean of the r count was 0.64, and the r table was 0.12. Therefore, it was judged as valid. The reliability test was obtained by Cronbach's Alpha of 0.951 0.80. The results show that there were 13 errors of scientific terms performed by participants. Wilcoxon test obtained the Asymp value. Sig. of 0,000 0.005 meaning that there were differences in the use of the term science in society and university. Representing and presenting were two aspects of scientific communication, with 40% obtain-ing moderate criteria. The research concludes that the scientific terms' error affects prospective teachers' sci-entific communication and progressive education since the errors have become a long habit. It must be over-come because the habit scientifically will also influence the trust of scientific truth.
科学术语错误对未来教师科学交际的影响及推进教育
在交际中,术语使用的错误可能是由于对词语含义的误解造成的,甚至使用者可能意识到自己的错误,但却故意使用它。因此,本研究旨在找出影响未来科学教师科学交流的科学术语使用错误。研究设计采用顺序解释策略的混合方法。采用可选李克特量表(Likert Scale)的5个选项,通过封闭式问卷收集数据,并进行定量分析。共有256名参与者或准科学教师作为研究对象。r计数的平均值为0.64,r表为0.12。因此,它被判定为有效。信度检验采用Cronbach’s Alpha为0.951 0.80。结果显示,被试在科学术语上有13个错误。Wilcoxon检验得到Asymp值。Sig. = 0000 0.005意味着在社会和大学中科学一词的使用存在差异。代表和呈现是科学传播的两个方面,其中40%为中等标准。研究认为,科学术语错误已成为一种长期的习惯,影响了准教师的科学交流和进步教育。它必须克服,因为科学的习惯也会影响对科学真理的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信