Reassurance and Deterrence in Asia

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
O. Mastro
{"title":"Reassurance and Deterrence in Asia","authors":"O. Mastro","doi":"10.1080/09636412.2022.2140598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the former Warsaw Pact members of NATO, which view the United States as the ultimate defender against Russia, and long-standing NATO members such as France, which, at least prior to the expanded Russian war against Ukraine in 2022, had grown less enamored of European dependence on American security commitments, it is critical to gain insight into how Europeans view their role within NATO. The reassurance issues Blankenship and Lin-Greenberg raise will only grow more complex if Europe manages to develop more significant strategic capabilities of its own, and the United States rebalances more of its foreign and national security policy over time away from Europe and toward the Indo-Pacific.","PeriodicalId":47478,"journal":{"name":"Security Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"743 - 750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2022.2140598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the former Warsaw Pact members of NATO, which view the United States as the ultimate defender against Russia, and long-standing NATO members such as France, which, at least prior to the expanded Russian war against Ukraine in 2022, had grown less enamored of European dependence on American security commitments, it is critical to gain insight into how Europeans view their role within NATO. The reassurance issues Blankenship and Lin-Greenberg raise will only grow more complex if Europe manages to develop more significant strategic capabilities of its own, and the United States rebalances more of its foreign and national security policy over time away from Europe and toward the Indo-Pacific.
亚洲的安抚与威慑
北约的前华约成员国将美国视为对抗俄罗斯的最终捍卫者,而法国等北约长期成员国至少在2022年俄罗斯扩大对乌克兰的战争之前,对欧洲对美国安全承诺的依赖程度有所下降,因此深入了解欧洲人如何看待他们在北约中的作用至关重要。如果欧洲设法发展自己更重要的战略能力,而美国随着时间的推移从欧洲向印太地区重新平衡其外交和国家安全政策,布兰肯希普和林格林伯格提出的保证问题只会变得更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Security Studies
Security Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Security Studies publishes innovative scholarly manuscripts that make a significant contribution – whether theoretical, empirical, or both – to our understanding of international security. Studies that do not emphasize the causes and consequences of war or the sources and conditions of peace fall outside the journal’s domain. Security Studies features articles that develop, test, and debate theories of international security – that is, articles that address an important research question, display innovation in research, contribute in a novel way to a body of knowledge, and (as appropriate) demonstrate theoretical development with state-of-the art use of appropriate methodological tools. While we encourage authors to discuss the policy implications of their work, articles that are primarily policy-oriented do not fit the journal’s mission. The journal publishes articles that challenge the conventional wisdom in the area of international security studies. Security Studies includes a wide range of topics ranging from nuclear proliferation and deterrence, civil-military relations, strategic culture, ethnic conflicts and their resolution, epidemics and national security, democracy and foreign-policy decision making, developments in qualitative and multi-method research, and the future of security studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信