Lymphocyte active immunotherapy for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xianjiang Wei, X. Fang, Ling Tong
{"title":"Lymphocyte active immunotherapy for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion","authors":"Xianjiang Wei, X. Fang, Ling Tong","doi":"10.3329/BJP.V13I4.37278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is to evaluate the curative effect of lymphocyte active immune treatment for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Fourteen randomized controlled trials of 994 subjects were included. Blocking antibody positive rate of patients who experienced a new pregnancy showed significant differences between immunotherapy and placebo. Moreover, live birth rate among paternal or third-party donor lymphocytes and placebo groups had significant difference [RR= 1.63, 95% CI (1.38-1.92), p<0.05]. Trial sequential analysis showed that the Z-curve crosses the trial sequential monitoring boundaries, confirming that the clinical benefit of active immunotherapy was significant. Subgroup analysis suggests that immunotherapy with lymphocytes might be more effective for primary recurrent spontaneous abortion than for secondary recurrent miscarriage. Taken together, women with primary recurrent spontaneous abortion who are negative for blocking antibody prior to treatment seemed most likely to obtain a potential beneficial effect of lymphocyte active immunotherapy, but not secondary recurrent spontaneous abortion.","PeriodicalId":8719,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/BJP.V13I4.37278","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/BJP.V13I4.37278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study is to evaluate the curative effect of lymphocyte active immune treatment for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Fourteen randomized controlled trials of 994 subjects were included. Blocking antibody positive rate of patients who experienced a new pregnancy showed significant differences between immunotherapy and placebo. Moreover, live birth rate among paternal or third-party donor lymphocytes and placebo groups had significant difference [RR= 1.63, 95% CI (1.38-1.92), p<0.05]. Trial sequential analysis showed that the Z-curve crosses the trial sequential monitoring boundaries, confirming that the clinical benefit of active immunotherapy was significant. Subgroup analysis suggests that immunotherapy with lymphocytes might be more effective for primary recurrent spontaneous abortion than for secondary recurrent miscarriage. Taken together, women with primary recurrent spontaneous abortion who are negative for blocking antibody prior to treatment seemed most likely to obtain a potential beneficial effect of lymphocyte active immunotherapy, but not secondary recurrent spontaneous abortion.
淋巴细胞主动免疫疗法治疗不明原因复发性自然流产
本研究旨在评价淋巴细胞主动免疫治疗不明原因复发性自然流产的疗效。包括994名受试者的14项随机对照试验。新妊娠患者的阻断抗体阳性率在免疫疗法和安慰剂之间存在显著差异。此外,父亲或第三方供体淋巴细胞与安慰剂组的活产率存在显著差异[RR=1.63,95%CI(1.38-1.92),p<0.05]。试验序列分析显示,Z曲线跨越了试验序列监测边界,证实主动免疫疗法的临床效益显著。亚组分析表明,淋巴细胞免疫疗法对原发性复发性自然流产可能比对继发性复发性流产更有效。总之,治疗前阻断抗体呈阴性的原发性复发性自然流产妇女似乎最有可能获得淋巴细胞活性免疫疗法的潜在有益效果,而不是继发性复发性自发流产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology
Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
18.80%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology (Bangladesh J Pharmacol) is an open access, video component, peer-reviewed journal of the Bangladesh Pharmacological Society (BDPS). A scholarly publication is defined ''open access'' when there are no financial, legal or technical barriers to accessing it. Anyone can read, download, copy, distribute, print or use it in educational purpose within the legal agreements. Peer review of a manuscript means the evaluation of research work by one or more people with similar competences. It can be open or blind. We do the single-blind peer review. Our readers want to know the methodology used by the researchers which is very important to get the results. The video clip of one of the methodologies is prepared by the authors and submit it to publish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信