Participatory budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). A comparative analysis of the drivers of success

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Roberto Falanga, Lígia Helena Hahn Lüchmann, A. Nicoletti, H. Domingos
{"title":"Participatory budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). A comparative analysis of the drivers of success","authors":"Roberto Falanga, Lígia Helena Hahn Lüchmann, A. Nicoletti, H. Domingos","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is a comparative analysis of two internationally awarded cases of Participatory Budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). Our main argument is that the success of these PBs relies on political/administrative, societal, and geographic drivers. This conceptual model has been adopted to analyse and discuss the success of the two case studies. The provision of an original conceptual model for comparative analysis and the empirical knowledge from the two cities are supported by the review of main literature in this field of study, and aim to contribute, with original findings, to the international debate on participatory budgeting.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":"16 1","pages":"273 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article is a comparative analysis of two internationally awarded cases of Participatory Budgets in Canoas (Brazil) and Cascais (Portugal). Our main argument is that the success of these PBs relies on political/administrative, societal, and geographic drivers. This conceptual model has been adopted to analyse and discuss the success of the two case studies. The provision of an original conceptual model for comparative analysis and the empirical knowledge from the two cities are supported by the review of main literature in this field of study, and aim to contribute, with original findings, to the international debate on participatory budgeting.
卡诺亚斯(巴西)和卡斯凯(葡萄牙)的参与性预算。成功驱动因素的比较分析
摘要本文对巴西卡诺亚斯和葡萄牙卡斯凯的两个参与式预算国际案例进行了比较分析。我们的主要论点是,这些PB的成功取决于政治/行政、社会和地理驱动因素。采用这一概念模型来分析和讨论两个案例研究的成功。提供一个用于比较分析的原始概念模型和来自这两个城市的经验知识得到了这一研究领域主要文献的审查的支持,其目的是以原始发现为参与式预算编制的国际辩论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信