Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Atul Gupta, Poonam Raj, A. Sood, Anil Raghavan
{"title":"Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection","authors":"Atul Gupta, Poonam Raj, A. Sood, Anil Raghavan","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_103_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acoustic trauma is the sudden hearing loss that results following exposure to a single intense sound. Military environments inherently expose its personnel to very high levels of noise. Early detection of temporary or permanent hearing damage in soldiers following acoustic trauma and identification of their susceptibility to noise exposure is of utmost importance to better protect and prevent hearing deterioration. Conventionally, pure-tone audiometry (PTA) has been used as a screening method to detect hearing threshold shift following noise exposure. However, research now suggests distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) as a more sensitive tool to detect early changes in hearing thresholds following acoustic trauma. The aim of this study is to compare PTA and DPOAE for the early detection of acoustic trauma in soldiers. Methods: A prospective cohort multicentric study was conducted over a 2-year duration at 5 military hospitals on 1500 newly inducted recruits with no previous exposure to firing. After a thorough history taking and a comprehensive ENT examination, PTA and DPOAE tests were conducted at three intervals: before firing (initial evaluation), 2 h after firing (mid-evaluation), and 7 days after firing (final evaluation). The symptoms presented by the recruits were also analyzed. Statistical analysis between the two modalities of investigation to detect early acoustic trauma was done using Chi-square test. Results: Four hundred and eighty-seven recruits (36.07%) developed temporary threshold shifts and 103 (7.6%) had permanent threshold shifts. The most common symptom at mid-evaluation was tinnitus (501; 37.11%) while the least common symptom reported was isolated dizziness (10; 0.74%). At final evaluation, the most common symptom was found to be tinnitus (132; 9.77%). Conclusion: PTA and DPOAE can both be effectively used as a tool of measurement for the detection of early acoustic trauma, though being an objective test DPOAE has the advantage of eliminating subjective variation.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"29 1","pages":"17 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_103_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acoustic trauma is the sudden hearing loss that results following exposure to a single intense sound. Military environments inherently expose its personnel to very high levels of noise. Early detection of temporary or permanent hearing damage in soldiers following acoustic trauma and identification of their susceptibility to noise exposure is of utmost importance to better protect and prevent hearing deterioration. Conventionally, pure-tone audiometry (PTA) has been used as a screening method to detect hearing threshold shift following noise exposure. However, research now suggests distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) as a more sensitive tool to detect early changes in hearing thresholds following acoustic trauma. The aim of this study is to compare PTA and DPOAE for the early detection of acoustic trauma in soldiers. Methods: A prospective cohort multicentric study was conducted over a 2-year duration at 5 military hospitals on 1500 newly inducted recruits with no previous exposure to firing. After a thorough history taking and a comprehensive ENT examination, PTA and DPOAE tests were conducted at three intervals: before firing (initial evaluation), 2 h after firing (mid-evaluation), and 7 days after firing (final evaluation). The symptoms presented by the recruits were also analyzed. Statistical analysis between the two modalities of investigation to detect early acoustic trauma was done using Chi-square test. Results: Four hundred and eighty-seven recruits (36.07%) developed temporary threshold shifts and 103 (7.6%) had permanent threshold shifts. The most common symptom at mid-evaluation was tinnitus (501; 37.11%) while the least common symptom reported was isolated dizziness (10; 0.74%). At final evaluation, the most common symptom was found to be tinnitus (132; 9.77%). Conclusion: PTA and DPOAE can both be effectively used as a tool of measurement for the detection of early acoustic trauma, though being an objective test DPOAE has the advantage of eliminating subjective variation.
士兵的声损伤:纯音测听与畸变产物耳声发射作为早期检测工具
背景:听觉创伤是指暴露于单一强烈声音后导致的突然听力损失。军事环境固有地使其人员暴露在非常高的噪音水平下。早期发现士兵在声学创伤后的暂时或永久性听力损伤,并确定他们对噪声暴露的易感性,对于更好地保护和防止听力恶化至关重要。传统上,纯音测听法(PTA)已被用作检测噪声暴露后听力阈值偏移的筛选方法。然而,现在的研究表明,畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)是一种更灵敏的工具,可以检测声损伤后听力阈值的早期变化。本研究的目的是比较PTA和DPOAE对士兵声损伤的早期检测。方法:在5家军事医院对1500名新兵进行了为期2年的前瞻性队列多中心研究,这些新兵以前没有接触过射击。在彻底的病史采集和全面的耳鼻喉科检查后,每隔三段时间进行PTA和DPOAE测试:发射前(初步评估)、发射后2小时(中期评估)和发射后7天(最终评估)。还对新兵出现的症状进行了分析。采用卡方检验对两种早期声学损伤调查方式进行统计分析。结果:4887名新兵(36.07%)出现暂时性阈值偏移,103名新兵(7.6%)出现永久性阈值偏移。中期评估时最常见的症状是耳鸣(501;37.11%),而报告的最不常见症状是孤立性头晕(10;0.74%)。最终评估时,最常见的是耳鸣(132;9.77%)。结论:PTA和DPOAE都可以有效地用作检测早期声损伤的测量工具,尽管作为一种客观测试,DPOAE具有消除主观变化的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信