The correlation between clinical and radiological severity of osteoarthritis of the knee

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
SICOT-J Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2022014
Wynand Steenkamp, P. Rachuene, R. Dey, Nkosiphendule Lindani Mzayiya, Brian Emmanuel Ramasuvha
{"title":"The correlation between clinical and radiological severity of osteoarthritis of the knee","authors":"Wynand Steenkamp, P. Rachuene, R. Dey, Nkosiphendule Lindani Mzayiya, Brian Emmanuel Ramasuvha","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2022014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Primary osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of knee pain. Appropriate management of knee OA is based on clinical and radiological findings. Pain, deformity, and functional impairments are major clinical factors considered along with radiological findings when making management decisions. Differences in management strategies might exist due to clinical and radiological factors. This study aims at finding possible associations between clinical and radiological observations. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of 52 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee managed conservatively at a tertiary hospital arthroplasty clinic was conducted for three months. English speaking patients with primary OA were identified and included in this study. Pain and functional impairment were assessed using Wong-Baker Faces pain scale, The Knee Society Score (KSS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The Body Mass Index (BMI) of all participants was measured. Standard two views plain radiographs were used for radiographic grading of the OA. Anonymized radiographs were presented to two senior consultant orthopaedic surgeons who graded the OA using Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) and Ahlbäck classification systems. The severity of the functional impairment and pain score was then compared to the radiological grading. Results: The average age of our participants was 63 ± 9 years. Their average BMI was 34.9 ± 8.4 kg/m2, median self-reported pain, total WOMAC, and pain WOMAC scores were 8, 60, and 13, respectively. We observed no significant correlation between BMI and pain scores. Inter-rater reliability for KL and Ahlbäck grading was strong. There was no significant correlation between WOMAC scores and the radiological grades. Conclusion: There was no correlation between pain and functional scores, patient factors and radiological severity of OA of the knee.","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: Primary osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of knee pain. Appropriate management of knee OA is based on clinical and radiological findings. Pain, deformity, and functional impairments are major clinical factors considered along with radiological findings when making management decisions. Differences in management strategies might exist due to clinical and radiological factors. This study aims at finding possible associations between clinical and radiological observations. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of 52 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee managed conservatively at a tertiary hospital arthroplasty clinic was conducted for three months. English speaking patients with primary OA were identified and included in this study. Pain and functional impairment were assessed using Wong-Baker Faces pain scale, The Knee Society Score (KSS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The Body Mass Index (BMI) of all participants was measured. Standard two views plain radiographs were used for radiographic grading of the OA. Anonymized radiographs were presented to two senior consultant orthopaedic surgeons who graded the OA using Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) and Ahlbäck classification systems. The severity of the functional impairment and pain score was then compared to the radiological grading. Results: The average age of our participants was 63 ± 9 years. Their average BMI was 34.9 ± 8.4 kg/m2, median self-reported pain, total WOMAC, and pain WOMAC scores were 8, 60, and 13, respectively. We observed no significant correlation between BMI and pain scores. Inter-rater reliability for KL and Ahlbäck grading was strong. There was no significant correlation between WOMAC scores and the radiological grades. Conclusion: There was no correlation between pain and functional scores, patient factors and radiological severity of OA of the knee.
膝关节骨性关节炎临床与放射学严重程度的相关性
简介:原发性骨关节炎(OA)是导致膝关节疼痛的常见原因。膝关节骨性关节炎的适当治疗是基于临床和放射学检查结果。疼痛、畸形和功能损伤是在做出管理决策时与放射学检查结果一起考虑的主要临床因素。由于临床和放射学因素,管理策略可能存在差异。这项研究旨在寻找临床和放射学观察之间的可能联系。方法:对在三级医院关节成形术诊所保守治疗的52例原发性膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行了为期三个月的前瞻性横断面研究。本研究确定并纳入了患有原发性OA的英语患者。使用Wong Baker Faces疼痛量表、膝关节学会评分(KSS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评估疼痛和功能损伤。测量了所有参与者的身体质量指数(BMI)。标准两视图平片用于OA的放射学分级。向两名高级骨科顾问外科医生提供了匿名放射照片,他们使用Kellgren和Lawrence(KL)以及Ahlbäck分类系统对OA进行了分级。然后将功能损伤的严重程度和疼痛评分与放射学分级进行比较。结果:参与者的平均年龄为63±9岁。他们的平均BMI为34.9±8.4 kg/m2,自我报告的中位疼痛、总WOMAC和疼痛WOMAC评分分别为8、60和13。我们观察到BMI和疼痛评分之间没有显著相关性。KL和Ahlbäck评分的评分者间可靠性很强。WOMAC评分与放射学分级之间没有显著相关性。结论:疼痛与膝关节骨性关节炎的功能评分、患者因素和放射学严重程度之间无相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信