When Doves Feed Hawks: Ottoman War Decision and European Powers Towards the Crimean War

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
A. Balcı, Tuncay Kardaş, Y. Turan, İsmail Ediz
{"title":"When Doves Feed Hawks: Ottoman War Decision and European Powers Towards the Crimean War","authors":"A. Balcı, Tuncay Kardaş, Y. Turan, İsmail Ediz","doi":"10.1177/03043754221095306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When does the war party win in the decision-making process? Why does the peace party lose even if war is too risky? In this article, we show that certain balancing acts of the peace party might increase the confidence of the war party. We examine how the Ottoman Empire’s risky Crimean War decision and its war declaration against Russia on 4 October 1853 were shaped by internal debating through time, foreign penetration, and dynamic interplay between the Ottoman decision makers and a changing European strategic environment. The large literature on the Crimean War does not include a systematic analysis of the Ottoman origins of the Crimean War and the Ottoman war decision. We trace the Ottoman decision-making process in the fateful months of 1853 to establish the origins of the Crimean War. We empirically demonstrate the gradual formation of the Porte’s war decision by showing how the peace front stumbled upon war by inadvertently changing the decision structure in favor of the war party within a year.","PeriodicalId":46677,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives","volume":"47 1","pages":"67 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754221095306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When does the war party win in the decision-making process? Why does the peace party lose even if war is too risky? In this article, we show that certain balancing acts of the peace party might increase the confidence of the war party. We examine how the Ottoman Empire’s risky Crimean War decision and its war declaration against Russia on 4 October 1853 were shaped by internal debating through time, foreign penetration, and dynamic interplay between the Ottoman decision makers and a changing European strategic environment. The large literature on the Crimean War does not include a systematic analysis of the Ottoman origins of the Crimean War and the Ottoman war decision. We trace the Ottoman decision-making process in the fateful months of 1853 to establish the origins of the Crimean War. We empirically demonstrate the gradual formation of the Porte’s war decision by showing how the peace front stumbled upon war by inadvertently changing the decision structure in favor of the war party within a year.
当鸽子喂鹰:奥斯曼战争决策与欧洲列强对克里米亚战争的态度
交战方在决策过程中什么时候获胜?为什么即使战争风险太大,和平党也会失败?在这篇文章中,我们表明,和平党的某些平衡行为可能会增加战争党的信心。我们研究了奥斯曼帝国冒险的克里米亚战争决定及其1853年10月4日对俄罗斯的战争宣言是如何由内部辩论、外国渗透以及奥斯曼决策者与不断变化的欧洲战略环境之间的动态相互作用所形成的。关于克里米亚战争的大量文献没有包括对克里米亚战争的奥斯曼起源和奥斯曼战争决定的系统分析。我们追溯了1853年奥斯曼帝国的决策过程,以确定克里米亚战争的起源。我们通过展示和平阵线如何在一年内无意中改变有利于战争方的决策结构,从而偶然发现战争,实证地证明了波特战争决策的逐渐形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternatives
Alternatives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed journal, Alternatives explores the possibilities of new forms of political practice and identity under increasingly global conditions. Specifically, the editors focus on the changing relationships between local political practices and identities and emerging forms of global economy, culture, and polity. Published in association with the Center for the Study of Developing Societies (India).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信