A multi-study examination of intra-individual feedback loops between competence and value beliefs, procrastination, and goal achievement

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Maria Theobald , Lisa Bäulke , Henrik Bellhäuser , Jasmin Breitwieser , Björn Mattes , Garvin Brod , Martin Daumiller , Markus Dresel , Patrick Liborius , Matthias Nückles
{"title":"A multi-study examination of intra-individual feedback loops between competence and value beliefs, procrastination, and goal achievement","authors":"Maria Theobald ,&nbsp;Lisa Bäulke ,&nbsp;Henrik Bellhäuser ,&nbsp;Jasmin Breitwieser ,&nbsp;Björn Mattes ,&nbsp;Garvin Brod ,&nbsp;Martin Daumiller ,&nbsp;Markus Dresel ,&nbsp;Patrick Liborius ,&nbsp;Matthias Nückles","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, we tested intra-individual feedback loops between competence beliefs, value beliefs, and goal achievement (virtuous circles), and intra-individual feedback loops between goal failure and procrastination (vicious circle). We analyzed data from five independent intensive longitudinal studies with university students (<em>N</em> = 841, <em>k</em> = 23,448 observations). Pre-registered hypotheses were tested across the five studies and aggregated using meta-analytic methods. Results provided support for virtuous circles in self-regulated learning: Students who reported higher competence and value beliefs in one study session reported higher goal achievement, and higher goal achievement predicted higher competence and value beliefs in the subsequent study session. Results provided only partial support for a vicious circle: Procrastination was associated with lower goal achievement but goal achievement did not predict subsequent procrastination. The results have theoretical implications for models of self-regulated learning and methodological implications for the design of experience sampling studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, we tested intra-individual feedback loops between competence beliefs, value beliefs, and goal achievement (virtuous circles), and intra-individual feedback loops between goal failure and procrastination (vicious circle). We analyzed data from five independent intensive longitudinal studies with university students (N = 841, k = 23,448 observations). Pre-registered hypotheses were tested across the five studies and aggregated using meta-analytic methods. Results provided support for virtuous circles in self-regulated learning: Students who reported higher competence and value beliefs in one study session reported higher goal achievement, and higher goal achievement predicted higher competence and value beliefs in the subsequent study session. Results provided only partial support for a vicious circle: Procrastination was associated with lower goal achievement but goal achievement did not predict subsequent procrastination. The results have theoretical implications for models of self-regulated learning and methodological implications for the design of experience sampling studies.

胜任力与价值信念、拖延与目标达成之间的个体内反馈循环之多研究
在本研究中,我们测试了能力信念、价值信念与目标实现之间的个体内反馈循环(良性循环),以及目标失败与拖延之间的个体内反馈循环(恶性循环)。我们分析了来自5个独立的大学生密集纵向研究的数据(N = 841, k = 23,448个观察值)。预先登记的假设在五项研究中进行了检验,并使用元分析方法进行了汇总。研究结果为自主学习的良性循环提供了支持:在一次学习中表现出较高能力和价值信念的学生表现出较高的目标成就,而较高的目标成就预示着后续学习中表现出较高的能力和价值信念。研究结果只部分支持了一个恶性循环:拖延症与较低的目标实现有关,但目标实现并不能预测随后的拖延症。研究结果对自我调节学习模型和经验抽样研究设计具有理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信