A valence-based account of group interaction and decision making

IF 3.1 2区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Communication Monographs Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1080/03637751.2021.1998565

J. Bonito, Joann Keyton

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Group participants often develop a range of problem solutions before discussion. We addressed whether, and at what level of analysis, initial opinions influence discussion and perceptions of decision outcomes. The Group Valence Model (GVM) presents a dual-process approach to interaction and decision making as a function of the distribution of supportive and oppositional comments. GVM predicts that discussion reflects individual-level opinions until a group solution emerges, whereupon discussion is influenced by group-level factors. Data from four previous studies were machine-coded for supportive and oppositional statements. Results indicated that the model holds in some degree at the group level but not at the individual level. Discussion focuses on mechanisms that drive interaction prior to the emergence of a group-level solution.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于价值的群体互动和决策

在讨论之前，小组参与者通常会提出一系列问题的解决方案。我们讨论了初步意见是否会影响讨论和对决策结果的看法，以及在何种分析水平上影响讨论和看法。群价模型(GVM)提出了一种双过程的互动和决策方法，作为支持和反对意见分布的函数。GVM预测，讨论反映个人层面的意见，直到群体解决方案出现，然后讨论受到群体层面因素的影响。先前四项研究的数据是用机器编码的，用于支持和反对的陈述。结果表明，该模型在群体水平上有一定的适用性，但在个体水平上不适用。讨论的重点是在组级解决方案出现之前驱动交互的机制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Communication Monographs COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Communication Monographs, published in March, June, September & December, reports original, theoretically grounded research dealing with human symbolic exchange across the broad spectrum of interpersonal, group, organizational, cultural and mediated contexts in which such activities occur. The scholarship reflects diverse modes of inquiry and methodologies that bear on the ways in which communication is shaped and functions in human interaction. The journal endeavours to publish the highest quality communication social science manuscripts that are grounded theoretically. The manuscripts aim to expand, qualify or integrate existing theory or additionally advance new theory. The journal is not restricted to particular theoretical or methodological perspectives.