Gender Wage Gap, Gender Norms, and Long-Term Care: A Theoretical Framework

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ignacio González, B. Seo, M. Floro
{"title":"Gender Wage Gap, Gender Norms, and Long-Term Care: A Theoretical Framework","authors":"Ignacio González, B. Seo, M. Floro","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2022.2081353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Population aging in developed and developing economies has led to increasing number of older persons in need of care, posing a challenge to the social arrangements of care and creating important aggregate economic implications. This article proposes a simple theoretical framework to evaluate the interplay of gender norms and the gender wage gap, as well as specific characteristics of the paid care market such as occupational segregation and market power rents. By incorporating a degree of substitutability between women’s and men’s care work, the model shows how declines in the gender wage gap have small effects on the division of long-term care work in the presence of persistent gender norms. The study also shows that market power dynamics, in conjunction with gender norms, perpetuate reliance on women’s provision of unpaid care. The model has important implications for policies promoting gender-egalitarian household division of labor and affordable access to quality long-term care. HIGHLIGHTS The market logic of the paid care service sector must be analyzed in conjunction with gender norms. A declining gender wage gap does not translate to more equal sharing of long-term care work due to persistent traditional gender norms. Social norms shape the response of the distribution of care work to changes in market prices and perpetuate reliance on women’s unpaid care. Gender-aware policies should encourage egalitarian social norms to reduce women’s unpaid care burden.","PeriodicalId":47715,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"84 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2081353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Population aging in developed and developing economies has led to increasing number of older persons in need of care, posing a challenge to the social arrangements of care and creating important aggregate economic implications. This article proposes a simple theoretical framework to evaluate the interplay of gender norms and the gender wage gap, as well as specific characteristics of the paid care market such as occupational segregation and market power rents. By incorporating a degree of substitutability between women’s and men’s care work, the model shows how declines in the gender wage gap have small effects on the division of long-term care work in the presence of persistent gender norms. The study also shows that market power dynamics, in conjunction with gender norms, perpetuate reliance on women’s provision of unpaid care. The model has important implications for policies promoting gender-egalitarian household division of labor and affordable access to quality long-term care. HIGHLIGHTS The market logic of the paid care service sector must be analyzed in conjunction with gender norms. A declining gender wage gap does not translate to more equal sharing of long-term care work due to persistent traditional gender norms. Social norms shape the response of the distribution of care work to changes in market prices and perpetuate reliance on women’s unpaid care. Gender-aware policies should encourage egalitarian social norms to reduce women’s unpaid care burden.
性别工资差距、性别规范与长期护理:一个理论框架
在发达国家和发展中国家,人口老龄化导致越来越多的老年人需要照顾,这对照顾的社会安排提出了挑战,并产生了重要的总体经济影响。本文提出了一个简单的理论框架来评估性别规范与性别工资差距的相互作用,以及有偿护理市场的具体特征,如职业隔离和市场权力租金。通过纳入女性和男性护理工作之间一定程度的可替代性,该模型表明,在存在持续的性别规范的情况下,性别工资差距的下降如何对长期护理工作的分工产生很小的影响。研究还表明,市场力量的动态与性别规范相结合,使人们长期依赖妇女提供无偿护理。该模型对促进性别平等的家庭劳动分工和负担得起的高质量长期护理的政策具有重要意义。有偿护理服务部门的市场逻辑必须结合性别规范进行分析。由于持续存在的传统性别规范,性别工资差距的缩小并没有转化为更平等地分担长期护理工作。社会规范决定了护理工作的分配对市场价格变化的反应,并使人们长期依赖妇女的无偿护理。有性别意识的政策应鼓励平等的社会规范,以减少妇女的无偿照顾负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Economics
Feminist Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Feminist Economics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an open forum for dialogue and debate about feminist economic perspectives. By opening new areas of economic inquiry, welcoming diverse voices, and encouraging critical exchanges, the journal enlarges and enriches economic discourse. The goal of Feminist Economics is not just to develop more illuminating theories but to improve the conditions of living for all children, women, and men. Feminist Economics: -Advances feminist inquiry into economic issues affecting the lives of children, women, and men -Examines the relationship between gender and power in the economy and the construction and legitimization of economic knowledge -Extends feminist theoretical, historical, and methodological contributions to economics and the economy -Offers feminist insights into the underlying constructs of the economics discipline and into the historical, political, and cultural context of economic knowledge -Provides a feminist rethinking of theory and policy in diverse fields, including those not directly related to gender -Stimulates discussions among diverse scholars worldwide and from a broad spectrum of intellectual traditions, welcoming cross-disciplinary and cross-country perspectives, especially from countries in the South
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信