Ciudadanía y justicia. El control de constitucionalidad desde la democracia deliberativa

Q3 Social Sciences

Revista Derecho del Estado Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.18601/01229893.n55.11

Ana Cannilla, Silvia Suteu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Este artículo critica la defensa del control de constitucionalidad presentada por Cristina Lafont en su libro Democracia sin atajos. Por un lado, analiza el caso de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos para demostrar que no funciona como la tesis deliberativa de Lafont asume. Por otro lado, desarrolla dos críticas normativas y una metodológica. En relación con las críticas normativas, procede primero a problematizar la asociación de ideas de autogobierno y democracia con cuestiones de aquiescencia e identificación con el derecho, y después examina críticamente la idea de igualdad política que respalda la propuesta de Lafont. Finalmente, invita a la autora a explorar el potencial deliberativo que ofrecen las diferencias en el diseño institucional de distintos mecanismos de judicial review.

查看原文本刊更多论文

公民身份和正义。论协商民主对法治的控制

这篇文章批评了克里斯蒂娜·拉方特在她的《没有捷径的民主》一书中提出的对合宪性控制的辩护。一方面，他分析了美国最高法院判例的案例，以证明它不像拉方特的审议假设那样有效。另一方面，它发展了两种规范性批评和一种方法论批评。关于政策批评，首先是将自治和民主思想与默许和对法律的认同问题联系起来，然后批判性地审查了支持拉方特提案的政治平等思想。最后，她邀请作者探索不同司法审查机制的体制设计差异所提供的审议潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista Derecho del Estado Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： The Revista Derecho del Estado is an academic publication that is open for discussion. It promotes the theoretical, analytical and critical analysis of state organizations and public law in general, with the understanding that by means of doctrinal debates it is possible to advance, from the legal science stance, in the development of improved rights and freedom regulation, in perfecting democracy and the consolidation and defense of the constitutional State. This publication is targeted to students, researchers and professionals interested in subjects relating to constitutional law, international public law, administrative law, political science and in general, to Colombian and international problematic issues. In regards to the papers which address academic affairs from the frame of reference of other countries, these must contribute to the systematic debate of the Latin American region and not be limited to isolated studies. Selection and publication of texts will not depend on theoretical concepts, points of view or selected methodology. The only consideration will be quality, rigor and the implicit norms of all academic work, with preference given to unpublished documents relating to the vast scope of public law, especially those that fit within the following categories: discussion articles, scientific research articles and revision articles Publishing language shall be Spanish, but texts in other languages may be included (English, French and Portuguese)