What Are the Odds?

IF 0.4 4区哲学 0 RELIGION

Novum Testamentum Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.1163/15685365-bja10020

Grant Adamson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article critiques prior epistolary analysis of the Mar Saba Clementine done by Jeff Jay in comparison with a variety of other Greek and Latin epistles. As a closer match, it brings forward Serapion’s letter on the Gospel of Peter apud Eusebius. Due to a pair of formal and conceptual parallels, combined in the Historia ecclesiastica, the article hypothesizes that Morton Smith’s discovery is a modern forgery, which he based upon Eusebius’s excerpt of Serapion in Hist. eccl. 6.12 and upon Eusebius’s paraphrase of the authentic Clement in Hist. eccl. 6.14.

查看原文本刊更多论文

几率有多大?

本文将周对《克莱门汀》的书信体分析与其他希腊语和拉丁语的书信体进行了比较。作为一个更接近的匹配，它提出了Serapion关于彼得·阿普德·尤西比乌斯福音的信。由于在《教会史》中有一对形式上和概念上的相似之处，本文假设莫顿·史密斯的发现是一个现代伪造品，他是根据尤西比乌斯在《历史》中对塞拉皮翁的摘录而发现的。ecc。6.12以及尤西比乌斯对《历史》中真实的克莱门特的转述。ecc。6.14。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Novum Testamentum RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Novum Testamentum is a leading international journal devoted to the study of the New Testament and related subjects. This includes text-critical, philological, and exegetical studies, and investigations which seek to situate early Christian texts (both canonical and non-canonical) and theology in the broader context of Jewish and Graeco-Roman history, culture, religion, and literature. ● For 50 years an unrivalled resource for the subject. ● Articles in English, French and German. ● Extensive Book Review section in each volume, introducing the reader to a large section of related titles.