Una historia filosófica de la identidad estadounidense: Balance de propuestas y su crisis actual

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Antonio Sánchez-Bayón, Gloria Campos García de Quevedo, Carlos Fuente Lafuente
{"title":"Una historia filosófica de la identidad estadounidense: Balance de propuestas y su crisis actual","authors":"Antonio Sánchez-Bayón, Gloria Campos García de Quevedo, Carlos Fuente Lafuente","doi":"10.15366/BP2018.18.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper is a critical synthesis, which makes a balance of main thought contributions that have favored the configuration of the American identity and its periodic reformulation. The thought systems are articulated, according to their transition from political theologians (such as puritans, charismatics and transcendentalists, with contributions like biblical pactism, free will, pietistic charity, manifest destiny, etc.), crossing to pragmatic philosophers (as the framers, democratizers and reconstructors, with resources like free-thinking -free-masonry & whigs-, federalism, pragmatism, etc.), until the socio-cultural academics (specially, from Cultural Studies, with concepts of consensus, i.e. frontiers, exceptionalism and melting pot; as well as proposals of differential issues –as result of the brain drain: Frankfurt School, Normale-Annales, Birmingham, etc.-, with notions of class, status and social conflict, ethniccultural metameres, gender constructs, etc.). The study moves until the currentcrisis, without generally accepted solutions and under the trans-Western risk.Keywords: Philosophical History, identity, crisis, United States of America (USA), trans-Western risk.","PeriodicalId":40614,"journal":{"name":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2018.18.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

AbstractThis paper is a critical synthesis, which makes a balance of main thought contributions that have favored the configuration of the American identity and its periodic reformulation. The thought systems are articulated, according to their transition from political theologians (such as puritans, charismatics and transcendentalists, with contributions like biblical pactism, free will, pietistic charity, manifest destiny, etc.), crossing to pragmatic philosophers (as the framers, democratizers and reconstructors, with resources like free-thinking -free-masonry & whigs-, federalism, pragmatism, etc.), until the socio-cultural academics (specially, from Cultural Studies, with concepts of consensus, i.e. frontiers, exceptionalism and melting pot; as well as proposals of differential issues –as result of the brain drain: Frankfurt School, Normale-Annales, Birmingham, etc.-, with notions of class, status and social conflict, ethniccultural metameres, gender constructs, etc.). The study moves until the currentcrisis, without generally accepted solutions and under the trans-Western risk.Keywords: Philosophical History, identity, crisis, United States of America (USA), trans-Western risk.
美国身份的哲学史:提案平衡及其当前危机
摘要本文是一个批判性的综合,它平衡了有利于美国身份的配置及其周期性重构的主要思想贡献。思想体系是根据他们从政治神学家(如清教徒,灵恩派和先验论者,贡献如圣经实践主义,自由意志,虔诚的慈善事业,天定命运等)到实用主义哲学家(如框架制定者,民主化者和重建者,资源如自由思想-自由砌体和辉格党-,联邦制,实用主义等)的转变,直到社会文化学者(特别是来自文化研究,有共识的概念,即边界,例外论和大熔炉;以及关于人才流失导致的差异问题的建议:法兰克福学派、Normale-Annales、伯明翰等,以及阶级、地位和社会冲突、种族文化元集、性别结构等概念。直到目前的危机,研究没有被普遍接受的解决方案,并在跨西方的风险。关键词:哲学史、认同、危机、美利坚合众国、跨西方风险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信