Cryptic, sibling or neither of the two? Integrative species delimitation of Psylliodes flea beetles with overlapping ranges

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Emanuele Berrilli, M. Biondi, Paola D’Alessandro, D. Salvi
{"title":"Cryptic, sibling or neither of the two? Integrative species delimitation of Psylliodes flea beetles with overlapping ranges","authors":"Emanuele Berrilli, M. Biondi, Paola D’Alessandro, D. Salvi","doi":"10.1111/zsc.12574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Species identification and delimitation are particularly challenging for morphologically similar and geographically overlapping species, such as in the case of Western Palaearctic flea beetle species Psylliodes kiesenwetteri Kutschera, 1864 and Psylliodes ruffoi Leonardi, 1975. In this study, we implemented an integrative taxonomic approach based on a comprehensive geographic assessment of morphological and genetic variation, including 142 adult specimens from 15 sympatric and allopatric populations. Results of species delimitation methods using the barcode marker COI show that molecular identification and delimitation between P. kiesenwetteri and P. ruffoi are straightforward. Single‐locus and multi‐locus phylogenetic analyses indicate these two species have a large genetic divergence and belong to two distinct clades of the Psylliodes gibbosa species group. Morphological identification based on qualitative characters shows great differences in identification success depending on the character used. Characters of male and female genitalia perform very well, but can only be assessed on fully sclerified individuals, whereas the colour of antennae was discovered as a new reliable diagnostic character both for teneral and fully sclerified individuals. Morphological identification is particularly sharp when multiple characters are used in combination or when a morphometric approach is performed. In conclusion, despite overall morphological similarity, P. kiesenwetteri and P. ruffoi are not cryptic species neither they are sibling species, as they belong to distinct clades within the gibbosa species group, and they can be reliably distinguished by morphological characters. This study substantiates the relevance of a range‐wide assessment of morphological and genetic variation, including individuals from the type locality, and both sympatric and allopatric populations, for taxonomic assessment of morphologically similar species with overlapping ranges.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species identification and delimitation are particularly challenging for morphologically similar and geographically overlapping species, such as in the case of Western Palaearctic flea beetle species Psylliodes kiesenwetteri Kutschera, 1864 and Psylliodes ruffoi Leonardi, 1975. In this study, we implemented an integrative taxonomic approach based on a comprehensive geographic assessment of morphological and genetic variation, including 142 adult specimens from 15 sympatric and allopatric populations. Results of species delimitation methods using the barcode marker COI show that molecular identification and delimitation between P. kiesenwetteri and P. ruffoi are straightforward. Single‐locus and multi‐locus phylogenetic analyses indicate these two species have a large genetic divergence and belong to two distinct clades of the Psylliodes gibbosa species group. Morphological identification based on qualitative characters shows great differences in identification success depending on the character used. Characters of male and female genitalia perform very well, but can only be assessed on fully sclerified individuals, whereas the colour of antennae was discovered as a new reliable diagnostic character both for teneral and fully sclerified individuals. Morphological identification is particularly sharp when multiple characters are used in combination or when a morphometric approach is performed. In conclusion, despite overall morphological similarity, P. kiesenwetteri and P. ruffoi are not cryptic species neither they are sibling species, as they belong to distinct clades within the gibbosa species group, and they can be reliably distinguished by morphological characters. This study substantiates the relevance of a range‐wide assessment of morphological and genetic variation, including individuals from the type locality, and both sympatric and allopatric populations, for taxonomic assessment of morphologically similar species with overlapping ranges.
神秘,兄弟姐妹还是两者都不?具有重叠范围的木虱-跳蚤甲虫的综合物种划分
物种识别和划界对于形态相似和地理重叠的物种来说尤其具有挑战性,例如西古北界跳蚤甲虫物种Psyllodes kiesenwetteri Kutschera,1864和Psylloodes ruffoi Leonardi,1975。在这项研究中,我们实施了一种基于形态和遗传变异的综合地理评估的综合分类学方法,包括来自15个同域和异域种群的142个成年标本。利用条形码标记COI进行物种划界的结果表明,kiesenwetteri和ruffoi之间的分子识别和划界是直接的。单基因座和多基因座系统发育分析表明,这两个物种具有很大的遗传差异,属于长臂猿物种群的两个不同分支。基于定性特征的形态学识别显示,根据所使用的特征,识别成功率存在很大差异。男性和女性生殖器的特征表现很好,但只能在完全硬化的个体上进行评估,而触角的颜色被发现是轻度和完全硬化个体的一个新的可靠诊断特征。当组合使用多个字符或执行形态测量方法时,形态识别尤其清晰。总之,尽管总体形态相似,但kiesenwetteri和ruffoi既不是隐物种,也不是兄弟物种,因为它们属于长臂猿物种群中的不同分支,并且可以通过形态特征可靠地区分它们。这项研究证实了对形态和遗传变异的广泛评估的相关性,包括来自类型地的个体,以及同域和异域种群,用于对具有重叠范围的形态相似物种进行分类评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信