Reliable non-destructive strength assessment in existing structures: myth or reality?

Q2 Engineering
D. Breysse, J. Balayssac
{"title":"Reliable non-destructive strength assessment in existing structures: myth or reality?","authors":"D. Breysse, J. Balayssac","doi":"10.21809/RILEMTECHLETT.2018.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The non-destructive assessment of concrete strength in existing structures is a complex issue which has been analyzed by a recently closed RILEM committee (TC ISC 249) whose Guidelines and Recommendations are to be released soon. This committee has considered the state of practice, the yet existing standards and most recent innovative research results, in order to write recommendations that would improve the reliability of strength assessment with non-destructive techniques (NDT). These recommendations are based on a paradigm change: the challenge is not that of finding the true local strength, but that of estimating its value with a controlled tolerance interval and a limited risk of being wrong. Three levels of requirements are defined which correspond to different tolerance intervals on the assessed parameters and to a different amount of resources devoted to the investigation. While most of research had been devoted until now to the identification of relevant conversion models between NDT test results and strength, we have shown that the priority had to be put on other items, including the assessment of the NDT test results repeatability, the relevant definition of core locations and the checking of the final predictive error. This paper briefly describes the main innovations included in these recommendations.","PeriodicalId":36420,"journal":{"name":"RILEM Technical Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RILEM Technical Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21809/RILEMTECHLETT.2018.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The non-destructive assessment of concrete strength in existing structures is a complex issue which has been analyzed by a recently closed RILEM committee (TC ISC 249) whose Guidelines and Recommendations are to be released soon. This committee has considered the state of practice, the yet existing standards and most recent innovative research results, in order to write recommendations that would improve the reliability of strength assessment with non-destructive techniques (NDT). These recommendations are based on a paradigm change: the challenge is not that of finding the true local strength, but that of estimating its value with a controlled tolerance interval and a limited risk of being wrong. Three levels of requirements are defined which correspond to different tolerance intervals on the assessed parameters and to a different amount of resources devoted to the investigation. While most of research had been devoted until now to the identification of relevant conversion models between NDT test results and strength, we have shown that the priority had to be put on other items, including the assessment of the NDT test results repeatability, the relevant definition of core locations and the checking of the final predictive error. This paper briefly describes the main innovations included in these recommendations.
现有结构的可靠无损强度评估:神话还是现实?
现有结构中混凝土强度的无损评估是一个复杂的问题,最近一个封闭的RILEM委员会(TC ISC 249)对其进行了分析,该委员会的指南和建议将很快发布。该委员会考虑了实践状况、现有标准和最新的创新研究成果,以便编写建议,以提高使用无损检测技术(NDT)进行强度评估的可靠性。这些建议是基于一种范式变化:挑战不在于找到真正的局部强度,而在于在可控的容忍区间和有限的错误风险下估计其值。定义了三个级别的需求,对应于评估参数的不同公差区间和用于调查的不同资源量。虽然到目前为止,大多数研究都致力于确定无损检测测试结果与强度之间的相关转换模型,但我们已经表明,必须优先考虑其他项目,包括无损检测测试结果可重复性的评估,核心位置的相关定义以及最终预测误差的检查。本文简要介绍了这些建议的主要创新之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RILEM Technical Letters
RILEM Technical Letters Materials Science-Materials Science (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信