COMPARISON OF THREE SHORT SIX-FACTOR PERSONALITY INSTRUMENTS

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bojana M. Dinić
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THREE SHORT SIX-FACTOR PERSONALITY INSTRUMENTS","authors":"Bojana M. Dinić","doi":"10.19090/PP.2018.2.189-206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to validate Serbian adaptations of three short six-factor model measures: 24 Questionnaire Big Six (24QB6), Mini-IPIP6, and Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Besides these measures, HEXACO-100 was applied on a sample of 310 participants (41% of male) from the general population. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed marginal fit indices for 24QB6, and satisfactory fit indices for Mini-IPIP6, but not for BHI. BHI also had the smallest Cronbach’s alphas for the scales, but the highest correlations with matching HEXACO-100 scales, confirming its convergent and discriminant validity. Regarding 24QB6, it was noticeable that all scales were valid, except for Honesty/Propriety, which showed substantial relations with both Honesty-Humility and Conscientiousness. Scales from Mini-IPIP6 had the highest alphas, but also the highest mean inter-item correlation, indicating that they measured a narrower scope of the traits. Also, validity of the Agreeableness scale was limited. Taken together, all the measures had advantages and disadvantages, and authors should choose a short measure in line with the importance of either validity or reliability.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primenjena Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/PP.2018.2.189-206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The aim of this research was to validate Serbian adaptations of three short six-factor model measures: 24 Questionnaire Big Six (24QB6), Mini-IPIP6, and Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Besides these measures, HEXACO-100 was applied on a sample of 310 participants (41% of male) from the general population. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed marginal fit indices for 24QB6, and satisfactory fit indices for Mini-IPIP6, but not for BHI. BHI also had the smallest Cronbach’s alphas for the scales, but the highest correlations with matching HEXACO-100 scales, confirming its convergent and discriminant validity. Regarding 24QB6, it was noticeable that all scales were valid, except for Honesty/Propriety, which showed substantial relations with both Honesty-Humility and Conscientiousness. Scales from Mini-IPIP6 had the highest alphas, but also the highest mean inter-item correlation, indicating that they measured a narrower scope of the traits. Also, validity of the Agreeableness scale was limited. Taken together, all the measures had advantages and disadvantages, and authors should choose a short measure in line with the importance of either validity or reliability.
三种短六因子人格工具的比较
本研究的目的是验证塞尔维亚对三种短的六因素模型测量的适应性:24问卷大六(24QB6), Mini-IPIP6和简短的HEXACO清单(BHI)。除了这些措施外,HEXACO-100还应用于来自普通人群的310名参与者(41%的男性)的样本。验证性因子分析结果显示,24QB6的拟合指标为边际,Mini-IPIP6的拟合指标为满意,而BHI的拟合指标为不满意。BHI量表的Cronbach 's alpha值最小,但与匹配HEXACO-100量表的相关性最高,证实了其收敛效度和判别效度。关于24QB6,值得注意的是,所有的量表都是有效的,除了诚实/得体,它与诚实-谦卑和尽责都显示出实质性的关系。Mini-IPIP6量表具有最高的alpha值,但也具有最高的平均项目间相关性,表明它们测量的特征范围较窄。宜人性量表的效度也受到限制。综上所述,所有的测量方法都有优缺点,作者应该根据效度或信度的重要性选择一个简短的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primenjena Psihologija
Primenjena Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology publishes original papers, brief communications, and review articles that deal with diverse areas of research in applied psychology including, but not limited to, organizational, social, educational, developmental, mental health, counseling, and sport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信