What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities?

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
GeoScape Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.2478/geosc-2021-0008
J. Pánek, V. Pászto, J. Burian, Jakub Bakule, Jakub Lysek
{"title":"What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities?","authors":"J. Pánek, V. Pászto, J. Burian, Jakub Bakule, Jakub Lysek","doi":"10.2478/geosc-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The active involvement of citizens in decision-making processes via geoparticipatory spatial tools is becoming a popular research field among geographers, GIScientists, environmental psychologists, political scientists and many others. This paper presents the idea of the Index of geoparticipation – an indicator-based index divided into three dimensions (communication, participation, transparency) that helps to evaluate the state of geoparticipation among Czech municipalities. It describes the current state of geoparticipation at the municipality level in Czechia. It aims to fill the research gap in finding which components of geoparticipation at the municipality level are being used, and how their use is affected by the size of municipalities and their membership of Local Agenda 21 networks. The paper builds upon an extensive dataset collected by the authors from all Czech municipalities (n=6 258) and presents various “shades” of geoparticipation in Czechia. Highlights for public administration, management and planning: • The highest average values of the Index of geoparticipation were obtained from the regions’ capital cities, followed by statutory cities, municipalities with extended powers, municipalities which are members of the Healthy Cities of the Czech Republic (HCCZ) network and cities. • HCCZ member municipalities use geoparticipatory tools significantly more than the rest of the Czech municipalities • The communication dimension is the most widely implemented pillar of the Index of geoparticipation • There is no significant relationship between social exclusion and geoparticipation at the nationwide level","PeriodicalId":42291,"journal":{"name":"GeoScape","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoScape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2021-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract The active involvement of citizens in decision-making processes via geoparticipatory spatial tools is becoming a popular research field among geographers, GIScientists, environmental psychologists, political scientists and many others. This paper presents the idea of the Index of geoparticipation – an indicator-based index divided into three dimensions (communication, participation, transparency) that helps to evaluate the state of geoparticipation among Czech municipalities. It describes the current state of geoparticipation at the municipality level in Czechia. It aims to fill the research gap in finding which components of geoparticipation at the municipality level are being used, and how their use is affected by the size of municipalities and their membership of Local Agenda 21 networks. The paper builds upon an extensive dataset collected by the authors from all Czech municipalities (n=6 258) and presents various “shades” of geoparticipation in Czechia. Highlights for public administration, management and planning: • The highest average values of the Index of geoparticipation were obtained from the regions’ capital cities, followed by statutory cities, municipalities with extended powers, municipalities which are members of the Healthy Cities of the Czech Republic (HCCZ) network and cities. • HCCZ member municipalities use geoparticipatory tools significantly more than the rest of the Czech municipalities • The communication dimension is the most widely implemented pillar of the Index of geoparticipation • There is no significant relationship between social exclusion and geoparticipation at the nationwide level
捷克各城市的地理参与现状如何?
公民通过地理参与式空间工具积极参与决策过程正成为地理学家、地理信息系统科学家、环境心理学家、政治科学家和许多其他人的热门研究领域。本文提出了地理参与指数的概念,这是一个基于指标的指数,分为三个维度(沟通、参与、透明度),有助于评估捷克市政当局的地理参与状况。它描述了捷克市政一级地理参与的现状。它的目的是填补研究方面的空白,找出市政一级的地理参与的哪些组成部分正在被使用,以及它们的使用如何受到市政规模及其在《21世纪议程》地方网络的成员的影响。该论文建立在作者从捷克所有城市(n=6 258)收集的广泛数据集的基础上,并呈现了捷克地缘参与的各种“阴影”。公共行政、管理和规划方面的亮点:•地理参与指数的最高平均值来自各地区的首府城市,其次是法定城市、权力扩大的城市、捷克共和国健康城市网络成员城市和城市。•HCCZ成员城市比其他捷克城市更多地使用地缘参与工具•沟通维度是地缘参与指数中最广泛实施的支柱•在全国范围内,社会排斥与地缘参与之间没有显著关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GeoScape
GeoScape GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信