Claiming Urban Form for Liveability: An Analysis of Urban Social Movements in Istanbul

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Büyükcivelek, Pinar Çobanyilmaz, Ecem Kutlay
{"title":"Claiming Urban Form for Liveability: An Analysis of Urban Social Movements in Istanbul","authors":"A. Büyükcivelek, Pinar Çobanyilmaz, Ecem Kutlay","doi":"10.2148/benv.48.3.445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All dimensions of liveability, from economic to social, are directly related to urban space and its production process. However, the production of urban space, with its forms and functions, is always situated in the con flicting domain of (spatial) political economy. Conventional space\n production processes that favour dominant classes and produce space regarding exchange value are frequently contested with the social reaction of dominated classes defending use values and liveability. In this vein, Urban Social Movements (USMs) seem one of the key instruments for the social\n production of urban space with be er liveability conditions. From this perspective, the study aims to investigate USMs' space transforming capacity by focusing on the case of Istanbul. A five-step spatial analysis is conducted, assuming that USMs are closely related to the characteristics\n of urban development projects. In these steps (i) the location of the urban development projects and USMs; (ii) existing land use in the project areas; (iii) scale of the projects, (iv) organization level of USMs; and (v) relationships of four USM-related projects within the urban fabric are\n analysed. Findings of the study reveal that centrality plays a vital role in both development projects and related USMs and aff ects the programme, scale, and organization level. Considering liveability conditions, faced with aggressive capitalist behaviour supported by local and central state\n apparatus, USMs can realize their space transforming potential only by protecting existing programmes and urban fabric.","PeriodicalId":53715,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.48.3.445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

All dimensions of liveability, from economic to social, are directly related to urban space and its production process. However, the production of urban space, with its forms and functions, is always situated in the con flicting domain of (spatial) political economy. Conventional space production processes that favour dominant classes and produce space regarding exchange value are frequently contested with the social reaction of dominated classes defending use values and liveability. In this vein, Urban Social Movements (USMs) seem one of the key instruments for the social production of urban space with be er liveability conditions. From this perspective, the study aims to investigate USMs' space transforming capacity by focusing on the case of Istanbul. A five-step spatial analysis is conducted, assuming that USMs are closely related to the characteristics of urban development projects. In these steps (i) the location of the urban development projects and USMs; (ii) existing land use in the project areas; (iii) scale of the projects, (iv) organization level of USMs; and (v) relationships of four USM-related projects within the urban fabric are analysed. Findings of the study reveal that centrality plays a vital role in both development projects and related USMs and aff ects the programme, scale, and organization level. Considering liveability conditions, faced with aggressive capitalist behaviour supported by local and central state apparatus, USMs can realize their space transforming potential only by protecting existing programmes and urban fabric.
主张宜居性的城市形态:伊斯坦布尔城市社会运动分析
从经济到社会,所有宜居性的维度都与城市空间及其生产过程直接相关。然而,城市空间的生产及其形式和功能,始终处于(空间)政治经济学的冲突领域。传统的空间生产过程有利于统治阶级,并根据交换价值生产空间,这经常与统治阶级捍卫使用价值和宜居性的社会反应相冲突。在这种情况下,城市社会运动(USMs)似乎是具有更适宜居住条件的城市空间的社会生产的关键工具之一。从这个角度出发,本研究旨在以伊斯坦布尔为例,探讨USMs的空间转化能力。假设USMs与城市发展项目的特征密切相关,进行了五步空间分析。在这些步骤中(i)城市发展项目和综合管理中心的位置;(ii)重建区内的现有土地用途;(三)项目规模;(四)USMs的组织水平;(v)分析了四个与usm相关的项目在城市结构中的关系。研究结果表明,中心性在开发项目和相关USMs中都起着至关重要的作用,并影响到项目、规模和组织层面。考虑到宜居性条件,面对由地方和中央国家机器支持的侵略性资本主义行为,USMs只有通过保护现有的项目和城市结构才能实现其空间改造潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Built Environment
Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信