Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Assessing Watershed Scale Pollution Risk: A Review of Combined Approaches and Applications

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zeynep Akdogan, B. Güven
{"title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Assessing Watershed Scale Pollution Risk: A Review of Combined Approaches and Applications","authors":"Zeynep Akdogan, B. Güven","doi":"10.1139/er-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making tools have become a prominent methodology in watershed management for many years due to the complexity of environmental systems and requirement for multi-disciplinary expertise. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a systematic methodology, which combines hierarchical structures of a problem and priorities for the alternatives in many fields. This study reviews MCDA applications in pollution risk assessment in the abiotic environments of watersheds for multi-pollutants. Over 80 papers published between 2000 and 2021 are identified in three categories of the Web of Science Core Collection database: ‘Environmental Sciences’, ‘Environmental Studies’ and ‘Water Resources’. The publications are further classified according to different environmental compartments; surface water, groundwater, and soil to investigate MCDA applications in these matrices. Finally, the distribution of the publications according to contaminants and MCDA methods used are also examined. The results reveal that the number of the studies focusing on pollution risk assessment within watersheds have been significantly increasing, especially over the last decade. However, there are still limited MCDA applications linking environmental compartments. Despite several MCDA studies focusing on the vulnerability of watersheds to multiple pollutants, studies related with emerging pollutants are scarce. Moreover, compared to non-point source pollution, studies adopting MCDA to investigate pollutant concentrations coming from point sources are relatively few. According to the overall distributions of MCDA methods, Analytic Hierarchy Process, a commonly found method in the literature that adopts a technique of pairwise comparison to prioritize criteria of prominence, dominates 34% of the publications.","PeriodicalId":50514,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2023-0017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision making tools have become a prominent methodology in watershed management for many years due to the complexity of environmental systems and requirement for multi-disciplinary expertise. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a systematic methodology, which combines hierarchical structures of a problem and priorities for the alternatives in many fields. This study reviews MCDA applications in pollution risk assessment in the abiotic environments of watersheds for multi-pollutants. Over 80 papers published between 2000 and 2021 are identified in three categories of the Web of Science Core Collection database: ‘Environmental Sciences’, ‘Environmental Studies’ and ‘Water Resources’. The publications are further classified according to different environmental compartments; surface water, groundwater, and soil to investigate MCDA applications in these matrices. Finally, the distribution of the publications according to contaminants and MCDA methods used are also examined. The results reveal that the number of the studies focusing on pollution risk assessment within watersheds have been significantly increasing, especially over the last decade. However, there are still limited MCDA applications linking environmental compartments. Despite several MCDA studies focusing on the vulnerability of watersheds to multiple pollutants, studies related with emerging pollutants are scarce. Moreover, compared to non-point source pollution, studies adopting MCDA to investigate pollutant concentrations coming from point sources are relatively few. According to the overall distributions of MCDA methods, Analytic Hierarchy Process, a commonly found method in the literature that adopts a technique of pairwise comparison to prioritize criteria of prominence, dominates 34% of the publications.
多准则决策分析在流域污染风险评价中的应用综述
由于环境系统的复杂性和对多学科专业知识的需求,决策工具多年来已成为流域管理的重要方法。多准则决策分析(MCDA)是一种系统的方法,它结合了问题的层次结构和许多领域的备选方案的优先级。本文综述了MCDA在流域非生物环境多污染物污染风险评价中的应用。2000年至2021年间发表的80多篇论文被确定在Web of Science核心收集数据库的三个类别中:“环境科学”、“环境研究”和“水资源”。根据不同的环境分类,出版物进一步分类;地表水,地下水和土壤研究MCDA在这些基质中的应用。最后,根据污染物和使用的MCDA方法对出版物的分布进行了检查。结果表明,流域污染风险评价的研究数量显著增加,特别是近十年来。然而,连接环境隔间的MCDA应用仍然有限。尽管一些MCDA研究侧重于流域对多种污染物的脆弱性,但与新兴污染物相关的研究很少。此外,与非点源污染相比,采用MCDA来研究点源污染物浓度的研究相对较少。根据MCDA方法的总体分布,层次分析法是文献中常用的一种方法,它采用两两比较的技术来优先考虑显著性标准,占出版物的34%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Reviews
Environmental Reviews 环境科学-环境科学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信