Diagnostic value of low dose dual-source CT cerebral perfusion imaging in patients with hyperacute cerebral infarction

Q4 Medicine
Pengjun Chen, Guangfeng Lin, Chenying Lu, Suhang Chen, J. Hui, Zhongwei Zhao, Jiansong Ji
{"title":"Diagnostic value of low dose dual-source CT cerebral perfusion imaging in patients with hyperacute cerebral infarction","authors":"Pengjun Chen, Guangfeng Lin, Chenying Lu, Suhang Chen, J. Hui, Zhongwei Zhao, Jiansong Ji","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate image quality and radiation dosage of CT cerebral perfusion (CTP) imaging of 70 kV with different tube current and scanning passes and its diagnostic value for hyperacute cerebral infarction. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 190 patients with suspected hyperacute cerebral infarction in Lishui Central Hospital of Zhejiang Province from December 2017 to February 2019 were selected prospectively, and all patients were divided into 4 groups according to random number table and received non-contrast CT examination and dual-source CT cerebral perfusion imaging with 70 kV protocol simultaneously within 6 hours after the onset of symptoms: group A, 120 mA, 21 scanning time points; group B, 100 mA, 21 scanning time points; group C, 100 mA, 17 scanning time points; group D, 80 mA, 21 scanning time points. The values of perfusion parameters such as cerebral blood flow (CBF), crerbral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP) were acquired. Image quality was evaluated and effective dose (ED) was recorded. The quantitative variables of image quality and radiation dosage were compared between four groups using one-way analysis of variance test. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no differences between groups on the CBF, CBV, MTT, TTP maps for all CTP values (P>0.05), and all images could meet the diagnostic requirements. The subjective image quality score of vessel sharpness and overall image quality of both internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery and the degree of noise of internal carotid in artery in group A was higher than that in group D (P<0.05). The score of vessel sharpness of internal carotid in artery ingroup A was higher than those in both groups B and C (P<0.05). The scores of vessel sharpness of both internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery internal carotid in artery ingroups B and C were higher than that in group A (P<0.05). The mean EDs of non-contrast CT in group A, B, C, D were 1.10, 2.11, 1.76, 1.42, 1.40 mSv; compared to group A, ED was reduced approximately 16.6% (0.35/2.11), 32.7% (0.69/2.11) and 33.6% (0.71/2.11), respectively (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of low dose dual source CTP for detecting hyperacute cerebral infarction was 93.5% (172/184), while that of non-contrast CT was 52.2% (96/184);for detecting hyperacutelacunar cerebral infarction, it was 72.1% (31/43) and 16.3% (7/43) respectively (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nAppropriate reduction of tube current (100 mA) and scanning passes (17 scanning time points) can reduce the radiation dosage and acquire comparable image quality for 70 kV protocol CTP. Compared with non-contrast CT, low dose dual-source CTP is more sensitive to hyperacute cerebral infarction, especially hyperacute lacunar cerebral infarction. \n \n \nKey words: \nCerebral infarction; Radiation dosage; Tomography, X-ray computed","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate image quality and radiation dosage of CT cerebral perfusion (CTP) imaging of 70 kV with different tube current and scanning passes and its diagnostic value for hyperacute cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 190 patients with suspected hyperacute cerebral infarction in Lishui Central Hospital of Zhejiang Province from December 2017 to February 2019 were selected prospectively, and all patients were divided into 4 groups according to random number table and received non-contrast CT examination and dual-source CT cerebral perfusion imaging with 70 kV protocol simultaneously within 6 hours after the onset of symptoms: group A, 120 mA, 21 scanning time points; group B, 100 mA, 21 scanning time points; group C, 100 mA, 17 scanning time points; group D, 80 mA, 21 scanning time points. The values of perfusion parameters such as cerebral blood flow (CBF), crerbral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP) were acquired. Image quality was evaluated and effective dose (ED) was recorded. The quantitative variables of image quality and radiation dosage were compared between four groups using one-way analysis of variance test. Results There was no differences between groups on the CBF, CBV, MTT, TTP maps for all CTP values (P>0.05), and all images could meet the diagnostic requirements. The subjective image quality score of vessel sharpness and overall image quality of both internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery and the degree of noise of internal carotid in artery in group A was higher than that in group D (P<0.05). The score of vessel sharpness of internal carotid in artery ingroup A was higher than those in both groups B and C (P<0.05). The scores of vessel sharpness of both internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery internal carotid in artery ingroups B and C were higher than that in group A (P<0.05). The mean EDs of non-contrast CT in group A, B, C, D were 1.10, 2.11, 1.76, 1.42, 1.40 mSv; compared to group A, ED was reduced approximately 16.6% (0.35/2.11), 32.7% (0.69/2.11) and 33.6% (0.71/2.11), respectively (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of low dose dual source CTP for detecting hyperacute cerebral infarction was 93.5% (172/184), while that of non-contrast CT was 52.2% (96/184);for detecting hyperacutelacunar cerebral infarction, it was 72.1% (31/43) and 16.3% (7/43) respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion Appropriate reduction of tube current (100 mA) and scanning passes (17 scanning time points) can reduce the radiation dosage and acquire comparable image quality for 70 kV protocol CTP. Compared with non-contrast CT, low dose dual-source CTP is more sensitive to hyperacute cerebral infarction, especially hyperacute lacunar cerebral infarction. Key words: Cerebral infarction; Radiation dosage; Tomography, X-ray computed
低剂量双源CT脑灌注成像对超急性脑梗死的诊断价值
目的评价70 kV不同管电流和扫描次数的CT脑灌注(CTP)成像的图像质量和辐射剂量及其对超急性脑梗死的诊断价值。方法前瞻性选择2017年12月至2019年2月在浙江省丽水市中心医院就诊的190例疑似超急性脑梗死患者,根据随机数表将所有患者分为4组,在症状出现后6小时内同时接受70kV方案的非对比CT检查和双源CT脑灌注成像:A组,120mA,21个扫描时间点;B组,100mA,21个扫描时间点;C组,100mA,17个扫描时间点;D组,80mA,21个扫描时间点。采集脑血流量(CBF)、crerbral血容量(CBV)、平均转运时间(MTT)、达峰时间(TTP)等灌注参数值。评估图像质量并记录有效剂量(ED)。采用单因素方差分析法比较四组间图像质量和辐射剂量的定量变量。结果CBF、CBV、MTT、TTP图各CTP值各组间无差异(P>0.05),各图像均符合诊断要求。A组颈内动脉和大脑中动脉的血管清晰度、整体图像质量以及动脉内颈内动脉的噪声程度的主观图像质量得分高于D组(P<0.05)B组和C组颈内动脉和大脑中动脉的清晰度均高于A组(P<0.05),A、B、C、D组非造影CT的平均EDs分别为1.10、2.11、1.76、1.42、1.40mSv;与A组相比,ED分别降低约16.6%(0.35/21.1)、32.7%(0.69/2.11)和33.6%(0.71/2.11)(P<0.05)。低剂量双源CTP对超急性脑梗死的诊断准确率为93.5%(172/184),而非造影CT对超急性脑梗塞的诊断准确度为52.2%(96/184);结论适当降低显像管电流(100mA)和扫描次数(17个扫描时间点),可降低70 kV CTP的放射线剂量,获得与之相当的图像质量。与非对比CT相比,低剂量双源CTP对超急性脑梗死,尤其是超急性腔隙性脑梗死更敏感。关键词:脑梗死;辐射剂量;层析成像,X射线计算机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信