Flow, Filling Ability and Apical Extrusion of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study

F. F. E. Torres, J. C. Pinto, J. Guerreiro-Tanomaru, M. C. Pereira, M. T. Filho, Pedro H. F. de Souza
{"title":"Flow, Filling Ability and Apical Extrusion of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study","authors":"F. F. E. Torres, J. C. Pinto, J. Guerreiro-Tanomaru, M. C. Pereira, M. T. Filho, Pedro H. F. de Souza","doi":"10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate flow, filling ability, and apical extrusion of three calcium silicate-based sealers, Neo MTA Plus (Avalon, USA), Bio-C Sealer (Angelus, Brazil) and Sealer Plus BC (MK Life, Brazil), in comparation with the gold standard based on epoxy resin, AH Plus (Dentsply, Germany). Methodology: The flow was evaluated based on ISO 6876/2012 standard (mm) and in area (mm2 ). For assessment of filling ability and apical extrusion of the sealers, curved artificial canals were prepared up to size 25.06, and filled with the sealers by the single cone technique. The samples were scanned in microcomputed tomography (SkyScan 1272. Bruker, Belgium) after preparation and after filling of the root canals. The percentage of voids throughout the entire extension of the root canals and in the apical third, besides the volume of apical extrusion of each sealer were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bio-C Sealer showed the highest flow and NeoMTA Plus had the lowest value (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer had lower percentage of total voids than NeoMTA Plus (p < 0.05). AH Plus had greater percentage of voids in the apical third than Bio-C Sealer and Sealer Plus BC (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer showed higher volume of extrusion (p < 0.05) than AH Plus and NeoMTA Plus. Conclusion: Bio-C Sealer and Sealer Plus BC had greater flow and proper filling ability in the apical third. However, these sealers presented high volume of apical extrusion. NeoMTA Plus provided less sealer extrusion, low flow, and more presence of voids.","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate flow, filling ability, and apical extrusion of three calcium silicate-based sealers, Neo MTA Plus (Avalon, USA), Bio-C Sealer (Angelus, Brazil) and Sealer Plus BC (MK Life, Brazil), in comparation with the gold standard based on epoxy resin, AH Plus (Dentsply, Germany). Methodology: The flow was evaluated based on ISO 6876/2012 standard (mm) and in area (mm2 ). For assessment of filling ability and apical extrusion of the sealers, curved artificial canals were prepared up to size 25.06, and filled with the sealers by the single cone technique. The samples were scanned in microcomputed tomography (SkyScan 1272. Bruker, Belgium) after preparation and after filling of the root canals. The percentage of voids throughout the entire extension of the root canals and in the apical third, besides the volume of apical extrusion of each sealer were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Results: Bio-C Sealer showed the highest flow and NeoMTA Plus had the lowest value (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer had lower percentage of total voids than NeoMTA Plus (p < 0.05). AH Plus had greater percentage of voids in the apical third than Bio-C Sealer and Sealer Plus BC (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer showed higher volume of extrusion (p < 0.05) than AH Plus and NeoMTA Plus. Conclusion: Bio-C Sealer and Sealer Plus BC had greater flow and proper filling ability in the apical third. However, these sealers presented high volume of apical extrusion. NeoMTA Plus provided less sealer extrusion, low flow, and more presence of voids.
新型硅酸钙基密封剂的流动、填充能力和尖端挤压:微计算机层析成像研究
目的:比较三种硅酸钙基密封剂Neo MTAPlus (Avalon,美国)、Bio-C Sealer (Angelus,巴西)和Sealer Plus BC (MK Life,巴西)与环氧树脂AH Plus (Dentsply,德国)的金标准密封剂的流动性、填充能力和根顶挤出性。方法:根据ISO 6876/2012标准(mm)和面积(mm2)对流量进行评估。为了评价封闭体的充填能力和根尖挤压能力,我们制备了直径为25.06的弯曲人工管,并采用单锥技术填充封闭体。样品在微计算机断层扫描(SkyScan 1272)中进行扫描。Bruker,比利时)准备和填充根管后。除计算每个封闭器的根尖挤压体积外,还计算整个根管延伸部分和根尖三分之一的空隙百分比。资料采用anova /Tukey检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。结果:Bio-C Sealer的流量最高,NeoMTA Plus的流量最低(p < 0.05)。Bio-CSealer的总空隙率低于NeoMTA Plus (p < 0.05)。AH Plus在根尖三分之一的空隙率高于Bio-C Sealer和Sealer Plus BC (p < 0.05)。Bio-C Sealer的挤压体积高于AH Plus和NeoMTA Plus (p < 0.05)。结论:Bio-C Sealer和Sealer Plus BC在根尖三分之一处具有更大的流量和适当的填充能力。然而,这些封口器表现出高容量的根尖挤压。NeoMTA Plus提供了更少的密封性挤压,低流量和更多的空隙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信