Comparison between determination of second anaerobic threshold by respiratory compensating point and X-method in rowers

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
L. Stefanov
{"title":"Comparison between determination of second anaerobic threshold by respiratory compensating point and X-method in rowers","authors":"L. Stefanov","doi":"10.15561/26649837.2022.0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim. The aim of this study is to verify the X-method for determining the second anaerobic threshold in rowers.Material and Methods. Twelve male athletes from the national rowing team of Bulgaria were tested. Participants performed a one-time graded incremental exercise test to exhaustion on a rowing ergometer. The workload were conducted on rowing ergometer system Concept 2, and spirometry system Clark C5. We obtained ventilatory indices, intensity and heart rate bred-by-bred for each participant, for each test stage. The anaerobic threshold was determined by two methods: 1) by the localization of the respiratory compensation point visually, after polynomial regression analysis of the trends for the dynamics of the ventilatory variables related to time and 2) by the X-method using the change in the ratio between heart rate and pulmonary ventilation. We compared the heart rate corresponding to the anaerobic threshold determined by both methods.Results. We found similar values for heart rate at the respiratory compensation point and the anaerobic threshold determined by the X-method for each of the investigated. The Shapiro-Wilk test showed a normal distribution of the two samples with a significance level of α = 0.05. Thus, the t-test for two paired samples showed a p-value of 0.202 at α = 0.05. We found a correlation coefficient r = 0.973 between the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold (determined by X-method) and the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold (detected at the respiratory compensation point). The Blant-Altman analysis showed that 95% of the points in the scatter plot lie within the confidence interval.Conclusions. The two methods give similar results and can be applied alternatively in the investigation of rowers in the age group 18.3 ± 1.07 years. The X-method always gives a reliable intersection point, which in our studies is close to the second anaerobic threshold. Comparative studies are also needed in other contingents for the wider use of the X-method.","PeriodicalId":52407,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2022.0204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The aim of this study is to verify the X-method for determining the second anaerobic threshold in rowers.Material and Methods. Twelve male athletes from the national rowing team of Bulgaria were tested. Participants performed a one-time graded incremental exercise test to exhaustion on a rowing ergometer. The workload were conducted on rowing ergometer system Concept 2, and spirometry system Clark C5. We obtained ventilatory indices, intensity and heart rate bred-by-bred for each participant, for each test stage. The anaerobic threshold was determined by two methods: 1) by the localization of the respiratory compensation point visually, after polynomial regression analysis of the trends for the dynamics of the ventilatory variables related to time and 2) by the X-method using the change in the ratio between heart rate and pulmonary ventilation. We compared the heart rate corresponding to the anaerobic threshold determined by both methods.Results. We found similar values for heart rate at the respiratory compensation point and the anaerobic threshold determined by the X-method for each of the investigated. The Shapiro-Wilk test showed a normal distribution of the two samples with a significance level of α = 0.05. Thus, the t-test for two paired samples showed a p-value of 0.202 at α = 0.05. We found a correlation coefficient r = 0.973 between the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold (determined by X-method) and the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold (detected at the respiratory compensation point). The Blant-Altman analysis showed that 95% of the points in the scatter plot lie within the confidence interval.Conclusions. The two methods give similar results and can be applied alternatively in the investigation of rowers in the age group 18.3 ± 1.07 years. The X-method always gives a reliable intersection point, which in our studies is close to the second anaerobic threshold. Comparative studies are also needed in other contingents for the wider use of the X-method.
呼吸补偿点法与x -法测定赛艇运动员第二厌氧阈值的比较
背景和研究目的。本研究的目的是验证确定赛艇运动员第二无氧阈值的X方法。材料和方法。保加利亚国家赛艇队的12名男运动员接受了测试。参与者在赛艇测力计上进行了一次性分级递增运动测试,直到筋疲力尽。工作负荷在赛艇测力计系统Concept 2和肺活量测量系统Clark C5上进行。我们获得了每个测试阶段每个参与者的通气指数、强度和心率。无氧阈值通过两种方法确定:1)在对与时间相关的通气变量的动力学趋势进行多项式回归分析后,通过视觉定位呼吸补偿点,2)通过X方法,使用心率和肺通气之间的比率变化。我们比较了由两种方法确定的与无氧阈值相对应的心率。后果我们发现,对于每一项研究,呼吸补偿点的心率和通过X法确定的无氧阈值的值相似。Shapiro-Wilk检验显示两个样本呈正态分布,显著性水平为α=0.05。因此,在α=0.05时,两个配对样本的t检验显示p值为0.202。我们发现无氧阈值下的心率(通过X方法确定)和无氧阈值下(在呼吸补偿点检测)的心率之间的相关系数r=0.973。Blant-Altman分析表明,散点图中95%的点位于置信区间内。结论。这两种方法的结果相似,可用于18.3±1.07岁年龄组赛艇运动员的调查。X方法总是给出一个可靠的交叉点,在我们的研究中,该交叉点接近第二厌氧阈值。还需要对其他特遣队进行比较研究,以便更广泛地使用X方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信