Nutrient utilization of native herbage and oat forage as feed for Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries)

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nadir Abdelraheem, Fuhou Li, Penghui Guo, Yi Sun, Yang Liu, Yunxiang Cheng, Xiongxiong Cui, Yuhui Tan, Fujiang Hou
{"title":"Nutrient utilization of native herbage and oat forage as feed for Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries)","authors":"Nadir Abdelraheem,&nbsp;Fuhou Li,&nbsp;Penghui Guo,&nbsp;Yi Sun,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Yunxiang Cheng,&nbsp;Xiongxiong Cui,&nbsp;Yuhui Tan,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou","doi":"10.1111/grs.12381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Satisfying the animals feed demand from the forage supply by grasslands remains a major challenge in the grassland–livestock ecosystem. To provide an alternative forage sources, this study conducted two feeding trials in the summer of 2015 and 2016 to compare the nutritive value, digestibility and nutrients utilization of native pasture (NH) and oat forage (OT) fed to Tibetan sheep (<i>Ovis aries</i>). Twelve Tibetan sheep with a mean body weight of 39.11 ± 3.66 kg in 2015 and 27.97 ± 2.69 kg in 2016 were use in this study. The experiment was 2 (year: 2015 and 2016) by 2 (forage: NH and OT) factorial. Data on proximate analysis, fiber fraction and nutrients digestibility were collected and analyzed using general linear model. However, the crude protein (CP) and water-soluble carbohydrates contents in OT were higher (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) than those in NH by 7.81–8.93% and 46.40–47.05%, respectively. In contrast, the neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber contents were higher (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) in NH by 14.28–15.78% and 15.62–18.00%, respectively. The dry matter digestibility coefficient in OT (0.82 in 2015 and 0.79 in 2016) was significantly higher than that in NH (0.68 in both years). In addition, the OT diet had higher (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) organic matter, NDF and CP digestibilities. Animals fed OT retained significantly more nitrogen (2.66 g/day in 2015 and 1.93 g/day in 2016) than those fed NH (0.96 g/day in 2015 and 0.42 g/day in 2016). The digestible energy and metabolizable energy were higher (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) in OT than in NH. Our data indicated that Tibetan sheep urinary N excretion increased by 0.726 g with increase of 1 g in the nitrogen intake. Conclusively, the OT had higher nutritive value than NH and could therefore use to satisfy livestock demand and reduce the grazing pressure on grasslands.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"69 1","pages":"12-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satisfying the animals feed demand from the forage supply by grasslands remains a major challenge in the grassland–livestock ecosystem. To provide an alternative forage sources, this study conducted two feeding trials in the summer of 2015 and 2016 to compare the nutritive value, digestibility and nutrients utilization of native pasture (NH) and oat forage (OT) fed to Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries). Twelve Tibetan sheep with a mean body weight of 39.11 ± 3.66 kg in 2015 and 27.97 ± 2.69 kg in 2016 were use in this study. The experiment was 2 (year: 2015 and 2016) by 2 (forage: NH and OT) factorial. Data on proximate analysis, fiber fraction and nutrients digestibility were collected and analyzed using general linear model. However, the crude protein (CP) and water-soluble carbohydrates contents in OT were higher (P < .001) than those in NH by 7.81–8.93% and 46.40–47.05%, respectively. In contrast, the neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber contents were higher (P < .001) in NH by 14.28–15.78% and 15.62–18.00%, respectively. The dry matter digestibility coefficient in OT (0.82 in 2015 and 0.79 in 2016) was significantly higher than that in NH (0.68 in both years). In addition, the OT diet had higher (P < .001) organic matter, NDF and CP digestibilities. Animals fed OT retained significantly more nitrogen (2.66 g/day in 2015 and 1.93 g/day in 2016) than those fed NH (0.96 g/day in 2015 and 0.42 g/day in 2016). The digestible energy and metabolizable energy were higher (P < .001) in OT than in NH. Our data indicated that Tibetan sheep urinary N excretion increased by 0.726 g with increase of 1 g in the nitrogen intake. Conclusively, the OT had higher nutritive value than NH and could therefore use to satisfy livestock demand and reduce the grazing pressure on grasslands.

藏羊饲料中天然牧草和燕麦饲料的营养利用
如何从草原的饲料供应中满足动物的饲料需求仍然是草原-畜牧业生态系统面临的主要挑战。为了提供一种替代的饲料来源,本研究于2015年和2016年夏季进行了两次饲养试验,比较了天然牧草(NH)和燕麦饲料(OT)对藏羊(Ovis aries)的营养价值、消化率和养分利用率。试验选用12只2015年平均体重39.11±3.66 kg、2016年平均体重27.97±2.69 kg的藏羊。试验采用2个因子(年:2015年和2016年)乘2个因子(饲料:NH和OT)。采用一般线性模型对近似分析、纤维分数和营养物质消化率数据进行分析。而粗蛋白质(CP)和水溶性碳水化合物含量,OT处理比NH处理分别高出7.81 ~ 8.93%和46.40 ~ 47.05% (P < 0.001)。中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(NDF)含量在NH中分别高出14.28 ~ 15.78%和15.62 ~ 18.00% (P < .001)。OT期干物质消化系数(2015年为0.82,2016年为0.79)显著高于NH期(两年均为0.68)。此外,OT饲粮具有较高的有机物、NDF和CP消化率(P < .001)。对照组的氮含量(2015年为2.66 g/d, 2016年为1.93 g/d)显著高于对照组(2015年为0.96 g/d, 2016年为0.42 g/d)。OT组的消化能和代谢能均高于NH组(P < .001)。我们的数据表明,藏羊尿氮排泄量每增加1 g,增加0.726 g。综上所述,土壤肥力比氮化氢具有更高的营养价值,可以用来满足牲畜的需求,减轻草原的放牧压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信