Selected approaches for conflict resolution in marriage disputes in Zimbabwe

O. Dodo
{"title":"Selected approaches for conflict resolution in marriage disputes in Zimbabwe","authors":"O. Dodo","doi":"10.4314/IJMA.V2I15.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Realising an increase in marriages, an increase in marriage violence and a subsequent rise in marriage homicide, the study explored the possibility of taking divorce as a preferred option towards ending marriage violence and subsequent homicide. The triangulated study adopted a descriptive survey design which collected data through questionnaires that were distributed to 160 purposively  sampled participants. The study followed an anti-positivist approach which relies on depth rather than width of data. Data were analysed and interpreted using NVIVO software and dyadic analysis, which provided for the analysis of descriptive and statistical data. It was the study’s finding that marriage conflicts and homicide are rampant in Zimbabwe and the available resolution systems have lost relevance and effectiveness. The study, noted that while marriages are good for the development of any society, if there are irreparable differences between couples, there is need to separate or divorce under what the study calls ‘just divorce’. The study concludes that ’just divorce’ is basically meant to save lives while allowing divorcees to reconnect after they would have really made up their minds and addressed emotions. It takes national authorities to appreciate the essence of ‘just divorce’ for them to embrace it as a policy. \nKey words: Marriage violence; Divorce; Marriage homicide; Family conflicts; Conflict resolution; Just Divorce","PeriodicalId":14088,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/IJMA.V2I15.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Realising an increase in marriages, an increase in marriage violence and a subsequent rise in marriage homicide, the study explored the possibility of taking divorce as a preferred option towards ending marriage violence and subsequent homicide. The triangulated study adopted a descriptive survey design which collected data through questionnaires that were distributed to 160 purposively  sampled participants. The study followed an anti-positivist approach which relies on depth rather than width of data. Data were analysed and interpreted using NVIVO software and dyadic analysis, which provided for the analysis of descriptive and statistical data. It was the study’s finding that marriage conflicts and homicide are rampant in Zimbabwe and the available resolution systems have lost relevance and effectiveness. The study, noted that while marriages are good for the development of any society, if there are irreparable differences between couples, there is need to separate or divorce under what the study calls ‘just divorce’. The study concludes that ’just divorce’ is basically meant to save lives while allowing divorcees to reconnect after they would have really made up their minds and addressed emotions. It takes national authorities to appreciate the essence of ‘just divorce’ for them to embrace it as a policy. Key words: Marriage violence; Divorce; Marriage homicide; Family conflicts; Conflict resolution; Just Divorce
津巴布韦婚姻纠纷冲突解决方法的选择
意识到婚姻的增加,婚姻暴力的增加以及随之而来的婚姻凶杀的增加,该研究探索了将离婚作为结束婚姻暴力和随后的凶杀的首选选项的可能性。三角法研究采用描述性调查设计,通过向160名有目的地抽样的参与者分发问卷来收集数据。这项研究采用了一种反实证主义的方法,它依赖于数据的深度而不是宽度。数据分析和解释使用NVIVO软件和二元分析,提供描述性和统计数据的分析。该研究发现,婚姻冲突和谋杀在津巴布韦猖獗,现有的解决机制已经失去了相关性和有效性。该研究指出,虽然婚姻对任何社会的发展都有好处,但如果夫妻之间存在不可弥补的差异,就有必要分开或离婚,研究称其为“离婚”。研究得出的结论是,“只是离婚”基本上是为了挽救生命,同时让离婚的人在真正下定决心并解决情绪问题后重新联系。只有国家当局认识到“公正离婚”的本质,才会把它作为一项政策来接受。关键词:婚姻暴力;离婚;婚姻杀人;家庭矛盾;解决冲突;刚刚离婚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信