A Comparative Analysis of Three Screening Methods for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in College Students

IF 1 Q2 Social Sciences
Emily M. Lund, Katie B. Thomas, Danielle R. Nadorff, Lauren M. Bouchard, Kate Galbraith, April R. Bradley
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Three Screening Methods for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in College Students","authors":"Emily M. Lund,&nbsp;Katie B. Thomas,&nbsp;Danielle R. Nadorff,&nbsp;Lauren M. Bouchard,&nbsp;Kate Galbraith,&nbsp;April R. Bradley","doi":"10.1002/jocc.12105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compared college students’ (<i>N</i> = 260) responses on a simple dichotomous screening measure and 2 behavior checklists. Seventy-nine participants (30.4%) screened positive (i.e., endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury [NSSI] behavior) on at least 1 measure, and 37 (46.8%) screened positive on the simple screen. Participants who screened positive on the simple screen reported more forms and instances of NSSI than did those who screened positive only on the checklist measures. They also reported significantly greater psychological distress compared with all other participant groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":46373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jocc.12105","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocc.12105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study compared college students’ (N = 260) responses on a simple dichotomous screening measure and 2 behavior checklists. Seventy-nine participants (30.4%) screened positive (i.e., endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury [NSSI] behavior) on at least 1 measure, and 37 (46.8%) screened positive on the simple screen. Participants who screened positive on the simple screen reported more forms and instances of NSSI than did those who screened positive only on the checklist measures. They also reported significantly greater psychological distress compared with all other participant groups.

大学生非自杀性自伤三种筛查方法的比较分析
本研究比较了大学生(N = 260)在简单的二分筛选量表和两个行为检查表上的反应。79名参与者(30.4%)在至少一项测试中呈阳性(即认可非自杀性自伤行为),37名参与者(46.8%)在简单测试中呈阳性。在简单筛查中呈阳性的参与者报告的自伤形式和实例比那些仅在检查表测量中呈阳性的参与者多。与所有其他参与者组相比,他们也报告了更大的心理困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of College Counseling
Journal of College Counseling PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of College Counseling, a publication of the American College Counseling Association, is issued twice yearly. ACCA members receive the Journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信