Bawdry, Cuckoldry, and Usury in Early Modernity and Postmodernity

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
D. Hawkes
{"title":"Bawdry, Cuckoldry, and Usury in Early Modernity and Postmodernity","authors":"D. Hawkes","doi":"10.1086/706220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mid themyriad tribulations of their professional lives, scholars of English Renaissance literature can take comfort from the knowledge that their specialist expertise is badly, even desperately, needed by contemporary society. The refusal of society’s regnant powers to acknowledge that fact only confirms it. The postmodern experience is irreducibly textual. Those best able to analyze, manipulate, and expound textuality are best equipped to understand the postmodern condition. It is their responsibility to evaluate in ethical terms the hegemony of performative representation, which is postmodernity’s definitive characteristic. The notion that ideal essences inform the appearances of senseperception seems eccentric today. The binary opposition between essence and appearance has been deconstructed, along with the polarities between substance and accident, matter and idea, subject and object. The dialectic of sign and referent has been displaced into the depthless differance of","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/706220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A mid themyriad tribulations of their professional lives, scholars of English Renaissance literature can take comfort from the knowledge that their specialist expertise is badly, even desperately, needed by contemporary society. The refusal of society’s regnant powers to acknowledge that fact only confirms it. The postmodern experience is irreducibly textual. Those best able to analyze, manipulate, and expound textuality are best equipped to understand the postmodern condition. It is their responsibility to evaluate in ethical terms the hegemony of performative representation, which is postmodernity’s definitive characteristic. The notion that ideal essences inform the appearances of senseperception seems eccentric today. The binary opposition between essence and appearance has been deconstructed, along with the polarities between substance and accident, matter and idea, subject and object. The dialectic of sign and referent has been displaced into the depthless differance of
早期现代性与后现代性中的淫乱、绿帽子与高利贷
研究英国文艺复兴时期文学的学者们在职业生涯中经历了无数磨难,但他们知道,当代社会迫切、甚至迫切需要他们的专业知识,这让他们感到宽慰。社会的统治力量拒绝承认这一事实,只会证实这一点。后现代经验是不可简化的文本。那些最能分析、处理和阐释文本的人,最能理解后现代的状况。他们有责任从伦理的角度来评价表演再现的霸权,这是后现代主义的决定性特征。理想的本质决定了感官知觉的表象,这种观点在今天看来似乎有些古怪。解构了本质与表象的二元对立,解构了实质与偶然、物质与观念、主体与客体的两极对立。符号与指称的辩证法已被取代为符号与指称的深刻差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信