Acute Appendicitis: How Often is Appendectomy Negative?

S. Timerbulatov, M. V. Timerbulatov, S. V. Fedorov, A. R. Gafarova, V. M. Timerbulatov, V. M. Sibaev
{"title":"Acute Appendicitis: How Often is Appendectomy Negative?","authors":"S. Timerbulatov, M. V. Timerbulatov, S. V. Fedorov, A. R. Gafarova, V. M. Timerbulatov, V. M. Sibaev","doi":"10.24060/2076-3093-2023-13-2-112-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Introduction. At present, medical practice lacks a unifi ed approach to the choice of therapeutic tactics for acute catarrhal appendicitis and therefore lacks understanding of negative appendectomy.   Aim. To study the incidence of negative appendectomy in acute appendicitis. Materials and methods. The methodology involved a retrospective analysis of the results of 1590 appendectomies performed from 2003 to 2005 and a prospective non-randomized study of 1112 patientsfor the period from 2018 to 2019. During the first observation period, the examination included physical and laboratory examinations, and in the second period, Alvaro scoring, ultrasound scan, and videolaparoscopy.   Results and discussion. In the first period, catarrhal forms of appendicitis were reported in 7.82 % of cases, while in the second period — in 3.04 %. The diagnoses were confi rmed pathohistologically in all cases.   Conclusion. No cases of performing negative appendectomy were reported, based on the results of clinical, endoscopic and pathomorphological examinations. However, the ambiguous interpretation of acute catarrhal appendicitis in the national clinical practice guidelines for acute appendicitis does not allow for unambiguous conclusions from the study.","PeriodicalId":52846,"journal":{"name":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2023-13-2-112-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Introduction. At present, medical practice lacks a unifi ed approach to the choice of therapeutic tactics for acute catarrhal appendicitis and therefore lacks understanding of negative appendectomy.   Aim. To study the incidence of negative appendectomy in acute appendicitis. Materials and methods. The methodology involved a retrospective analysis of the results of 1590 appendectomies performed from 2003 to 2005 and a prospective non-randomized study of 1112 patientsfor the period from 2018 to 2019. During the first observation period, the examination included physical and laboratory examinations, and in the second period, Alvaro scoring, ultrasound scan, and videolaparoscopy.   Results and discussion. In the first period, catarrhal forms of appendicitis were reported in 7.82 % of cases, while in the second period — in 3.04 %. The diagnoses were confi rmed pathohistologically in all cases.   Conclusion. No cases of performing negative appendectomy were reported, based on the results of clinical, endoscopic and pathomorphological examinations. However, the ambiguous interpretation of acute catarrhal appendicitis in the national clinical practice guidelines for acute appendicitis does not allow for unambiguous conclusions from the study.
急性阑尾炎:阑尾切除术阴性的频率是多少?
介绍目前,医学实践对急性卡他性阑尾炎的治疗策略选择缺乏统一的方法,因此对阴性阑尾切除术缺乏了解。目标。研究急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术阴性的发生率。材料和方法。该方法包括对2003年至2005年进行的1590例阑尾切除术的结果进行回顾性分析,以及对2018年至2019年期间1112名患者进行的前瞻性非随机研究。在第一个观察期内,检查包括身体和实验室检查,在第二个观察期,检查包括Alvaro评分、超声扫描和视频腹腔镜检查。结果和讨论。在第一阶段,7.82%的病例报告了卡他性阑尾炎,而在第二阶段,报告了3.04%。所有病例的诊断均经病理组织学证实。结论。根据临床、内镜和病理形态学检查的结果,没有进行阴性阑尾切除术的病例报告。然而,国家急性阑尾炎临床实践指南中对急性卡他性阑尾炎的模糊解释不允许该研究得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信