Red Flags for Early Referral for Infant Mental Health: Content Validation of a Tool

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Shweta Narayan, M. Kishore, S. Seshadri, H. Thippeswamy
{"title":"Red Flags for Early Referral for Infant Mental Health: Content Validation of a Tool","authors":"Shweta Narayan, M. Kishore, S. Seshadri, H. Thippeswamy","doi":"10.1177/09731342231179828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing evidence about the psychological distress and mental health issues experienced by infants with developmental problems. Problems related to developmental issues can be mitigated with early identification and intervention. A simple screening measure is needed to identify infants at risk for mental health issues to make informed decisions about further assessment and interventions. In this background, the present study aimed to develop a checklist to identify infants with psychological distress and at risk for mental health issues without the need to administer full-scale socioemotional tools and intended to be used by primary care professionals for early identification of risk factors followed by intervention to reduce the risk. Early identification of infants at risk in view of the limited resources would help in reducing the impact of early trajectories on the socioemotional health of any infant. The present study aims to develop a checklist for rapid screening. In view of the limited resources of low-income countries, early identification of infants at risk is important. This would help in reducing the impact of early trajectories on the socioemotional health of infants. The checklist was based on the “functional and emotional developmental approach” and a literature review of early indicators of psychological distress and mental health issues in infants. The checklist was prepared using objective terms which were further evaluated by mental health experts using standard methods. Accordingly, a content validity index (CVI) was calculated to determine the relevance and clarity of the items. Based on the CVI, 16 items were retained in the final checklist, which was reported to have excellent relevance (CVI = 0.91) and clarity (CVI = 0.84). The checklist is concise with adequate content validity and has the potential to be used in primary care settings to screen infants at risk for psychological distress and mental health issues and make appropriate referrals.","PeriodicalId":42760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09731342231179828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing evidence about the psychological distress and mental health issues experienced by infants with developmental problems. Problems related to developmental issues can be mitigated with early identification and intervention. A simple screening measure is needed to identify infants at risk for mental health issues to make informed decisions about further assessment and interventions. In this background, the present study aimed to develop a checklist to identify infants with psychological distress and at risk for mental health issues without the need to administer full-scale socioemotional tools and intended to be used by primary care professionals for early identification of risk factors followed by intervention to reduce the risk. Early identification of infants at risk in view of the limited resources would help in reducing the impact of early trajectories on the socioemotional health of any infant. The present study aims to develop a checklist for rapid screening. In view of the limited resources of low-income countries, early identification of infants at risk is important. This would help in reducing the impact of early trajectories on the socioemotional health of infants. The checklist was based on the “functional and emotional developmental approach” and a literature review of early indicators of psychological distress and mental health issues in infants. The checklist was prepared using objective terms which were further evaluated by mental health experts using standard methods. Accordingly, a content validity index (CVI) was calculated to determine the relevance and clarity of the items. Based on the CVI, 16 items were retained in the final checklist, which was reported to have excellent relevance (CVI = 0.91) and clarity (CVI = 0.84). The checklist is concise with adequate content validity and has the potential to be used in primary care settings to screen infants at risk for psychological distress and mental health issues and make appropriate referrals.
婴儿心理健康早期转诊的危险信号:一种工具的内容验证
越来越多的证据表明,有发育问题的婴儿会经历心理困扰和心理健康问题。与发展问题有关的问题可以通过早期识别和干预来缓解。需要一种简单的筛查措施来识别有心理健康问题风险的婴儿,以便就进一步的评估和干预做出明智的决定。在这种背景下,本研究旨在制定一份清单,在不需要使用全面的社会情感工具的情况下,识别有心理困扰和心理健康风险的婴儿,并供初级保健专业人员用于早期识别风险因素,然后进行干预以降低风险。鉴于资源有限,尽早识别有风险的婴儿将有助于减少早期轨迹对任何婴儿社会情绪健康的影响。本研究旨在制定一份快速筛查检查表。鉴于低收入国家的资源有限,尽早识别有风险的婴儿很重要。这将有助于减少早期轨迹对婴儿社会情绪健康的影响。该检查表基于“功能和情绪发展方法”以及对婴儿心理困扰和心理健康问题早期指标的文献综述。检查表是使用客观术语编制的,心理健康专家使用标准方法对这些术语进行了进一步评估。因此,计算内容有效性指数(CVI)以确定项目的相关性和清晰度。根据CVI,最终检查表中保留了16个项目,据报道,该检查表具有良好的相关性(CVI=0.91)和清晰度(CVI=0.084)。该检查表简洁明了,内容有效,有可能在初级保健环境中用于筛查有心理困扰和心理健康问题风险的婴儿,并进行适当的转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (JIACAM) is a peer reviewed online journal. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org) will be followed. JIACAM accepts original articles, review articles, case reports, conference announcements, summary of trials, letters to the editor and conference reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信