Goodwill impairment testing disclosures – South African compliance in 2018

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Charles Day
{"title":"Goodwill impairment testing disclosures – South African compliance in 2018","authors":"Charles Day","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2019.1668120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews compliance with the IAS 36 goodwill impairment testing disclosure requirements by South African entities included in the All Share Index of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. A detailed extraction of disclosures provided by entities with material levels of goodwill was compared to the key requirements. The approach taken is grounded in an assumption that the diligence with which preparers attend to visible disclosures acts a “litmus test” of the reliability of the invisible workings of the “black box” of impairment testing. The results are analysed through a critical narrative proposing insights relevant to preparers, auditors, regulators, and standard-setters. Consistent with results of studies in other jurisdictions the disclosures of South African entities are often incomplete and inconsistent, presented in a minimalist, generic, “boiler-plate” fashion considered to be of limited use to decision-makers assessing the reliability of impairment testing. This is the first known detailed review of South African levels of compliance with goodwill impairment testing disclosure requirements offered as an initial contribution to assessing the reliability of goodwill balances reported by South African corporate entities.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"45 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2019.1668120","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2019.1668120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper reviews compliance with the IAS 36 goodwill impairment testing disclosure requirements by South African entities included in the All Share Index of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. A detailed extraction of disclosures provided by entities with material levels of goodwill was compared to the key requirements. The approach taken is grounded in an assumption that the diligence with which preparers attend to visible disclosures acts a “litmus test” of the reliability of the invisible workings of the “black box” of impairment testing. The results are analysed through a critical narrative proposing insights relevant to preparers, auditors, regulators, and standard-setters. Consistent with results of studies in other jurisdictions the disclosures of South African entities are often incomplete and inconsistent, presented in a minimalist, generic, “boiler-plate” fashion considered to be of limited use to decision-makers assessing the reliability of impairment testing. This is the first known detailed review of South African levels of compliance with goodwill impairment testing disclosure requirements offered as an initial contribution to assessing the reliability of goodwill balances reported by South African corporate entities.
商誉减值测试披露——2018年南非合规情况
本文回顾了约翰内斯堡证券交易所所有股票指数中包含的南非实体对《国际会计准则第36号》商誉减值测试披露要求的遵守情况。对具有重大商誉水平的实体提供的披露的详细摘录与关键要求进行了比较。所采取的方法是基于这样一种假设,即财务报表编制人对可见披露的勤勉程度,是对减值测试“黑箱”中无形工作的可靠性的“试金石”。通过提出与编制人、审计师、监管机构和标准制定者相关的见解的关键叙述,对结果进行了分析。与其他司法管辖区的研究结果一致,南非实体的披露往往是不完整和不一致的,以极简主义、通用的“锅盘式”方式呈现,被认为对评估减值测试可靠性的决策者用处有限。这是已知的首次详细审查南非遵守商誉减值测试披露要求的情况,该要求是评估南非公司实体报告的商誉余额可靠性的初步贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信