Coronavirus misinformation and the political scenario: the science cannot be ‘another’ barrier

IF 1.7 4区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-30 DOI:10.31234/osf.io/vhkwc

M. Mendes

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sensible and conflicting scenario of the pandemic postulated many challenges to societies around the world in 2020. Part of this problem refers to how the differences between politics and science are not comprehended in their particularities. The recognition of limits and power of science and politics can not only contribute to reaching the actions and strategies facing novel coronavirus but also optimized many domains of societies post-pandemic.

查看原文本刊更多论文

冠状病毒的错误信息和政治场景：科学不能成为“另一个”障碍

大流行的合理和相互矛盾的情景假设了2020年世界各地社会面临的许多挑战。这个问题的一部分是关于政治和科学之间的差异如何没有从它们的特殊性中被理解。认识到科学和政治的局限性和力量，不仅有助于制定应对新型冠状病毒的行动和战略，而且还有助于优化大流行后社会的许多领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine considers articles on the philosophy of medicine and biology, and on ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the philosophy of medicine and biology, and the ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. It also considers papers at the intersection of medicine and humanities, including the history of medicine, that are relevant to contemporary philosophy of medicine and bioethics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is the official publication of the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University Medical Center.