Tracing the lean thinking in supply chain management: a comprehensive main path analysis

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Dejian Yu, Tong Ye
{"title":"Tracing the lean thinking in supply chain management: a comprehensive main path analysis","authors":"Dejian Yu, Tong Ye","doi":"10.1108/ijlss-06-2022-0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to contribute to the existing knowledge system of lean supply chain management (LSCM), i.e. by using main path analysis, and the authors extract the main development track of LSCM. It is advantageous for relevant scholars to deepen their understanding of this academic field from a bibliometrics view to grasp the future directions better.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nStructuring a citation network with the processed data set containing 866 papers and relevant information collected from Web of Science (WoS). Conducting review analyses aiming at the main paths that are extracted from the above citation network.\n\n\nFindings\nThere are two different evolution paths in LSCM field, i.e. improving corporate sustainability performance through combining lean and green practices, and seeking the balance between lean and agility to structure leagile supply chain for specific industries. LSCM research studies mainly focus on five aspects: (1) establishment and development of LSCM theory; (2) structuration of lean supply chain; (3) research studies of the relationship between LSCM and corporate performance; (4) supply chain evaluation system; and (5) review and vista of LSCM field. The intersection of two knowledge evolute routes would be Industry 4.0, which is an integrated theory system combining lean, agility, green and other supply chain thinking.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe data set collected from WoS cannot contain all the research studies about LSCM is the main research limitation. Sustainability, as represented by environmental performance, will continue to be a major pursuit of this field. Integrating LSCM in Industry 4.0 will be the next hotspot in LSCM field.\n\n\nPractical implications\nProviding the main research contents and common methods of LSCM field. It is conducive to deepening the understanding of relevant practitioners and scholars to LSCM field from a dynamic perspective.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first time to reveal the knowledge diffuse trajectories of LSCM under different view with main path analysis. This study is unique that it provides a new view to understand the field of LSCM.\n","PeriodicalId":48601,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-06-2022-0135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the existing knowledge system of lean supply chain management (LSCM), i.e. by using main path analysis, and the authors extract the main development track of LSCM. It is advantageous for relevant scholars to deepen their understanding of this academic field from a bibliometrics view to grasp the future directions better. Design/methodology/approach Structuring a citation network with the processed data set containing 866 papers and relevant information collected from Web of Science (WoS). Conducting review analyses aiming at the main paths that are extracted from the above citation network. Findings There are two different evolution paths in LSCM field, i.e. improving corporate sustainability performance through combining lean and green practices, and seeking the balance between lean and agility to structure leagile supply chain for specific industries. LSCM research studies mainly focus on five aspects: (1) establishment and development of LSCM theory; (2) structuration of lean supply chain; (3) research studies of the relationship between LSCM and corporate performance; (4) supply chain evaluation system; and (5) review and vista of LSCM field. The intersection of two knowledge evolute routes would be Industry 4.0, which is an integrated theory system combining lean, agility, green and other supply chain thinking. Research limitations/implications The data set collected from WoS cannot contain all the research studies about LSCM is the main research limitation. Sustainability, as represented by environmental performance, will continue to be a major pursuit of this field. Integrating LSCM in Industry 4.0 will be the next hotspot in LSCM field. Practical implications Providing the main research contents and common methods of LSCM field. It is conducive to deepening the understanding of relevant practitioners and scholars to LSCM field from a dynamic perspective. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first time to reveal the knowledge diffuse trajectories of LSCM under different view with main path analysis. This study is unique that it provides a new view to understand the field of LSCM.
供应链管理中的精益思维溯源:一个综合性的主要路径分析
目的通过主路径分析,为现有的精益供应链管理知识体系做出贡献,并提取出精益供应链的主要发展轨迹。有利于相关学者从文献计量学的角度加深对这一学术领域的理解,更好地把握未来的发展方向。设计/方法论/方法利用处理后的数据集构建引文网络,该数据集包含从科学网(WoS)收集的866篇论文和相关信息。针对从上述引文网络中提取的主要路径进行综述分析。发现LSCM领域有两种不同的发展路径,即通过将精益和绿色实践相结合来提高企业的可持续性绩效,以及寻求精益和敏捷之间的平衡来构建特定行业的精益供应链。LSCM的研究主要集中在五个方面:(1)LSCM理论的建立与发展;(2) 构建精益供应链;(3) LSCM与企业绩效关系的研究;(4) 供应链评价体系;(5)LSCM领域的回顾与展望。两条知识进化路线的交叉点将是工业4.0,这是一个结合了精益、敏捷、绿色和其他供应链思维的综合理论体系。研究局限性/含义从WoS收集的数据集不能包含所有关于LSCM的研究,这是主要的研究局限性。以环境绩效为代表的可持续性将继续是该领域的主要追求。将LSCM融入工业4.0将是LSCM领域的下一个热点。提供了LSCM领域的主要研究内容和常用方法。这有利于加深相关从业者和学者从动态的角度对LSCM领域的理解。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一次用主路径分析揭示不同视角下LSCM的知识扩散轨迹。这项研究的独特之处在于,它为理解LSCM领域提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Launched in 2010, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma publishes original, empirical and review papers, case studies and theoretical frameworks or models related to Lean and Six Sigma methodologies. High quality submissions are sought from academics, researchers, practitioners and leading management consultants from around the world. Research, case studies and examples can be cited from manufacturing, service and public sectors. This includes manufacturing, health, financial services, local government, education, professional services, IT Services, transport, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信