Case study: trepanation or injury? An example of an early medieval skull from Płock (Poland)

Q2 Social Sciences
Aleksandra Partynska, Daria Gromnicka
{"title":"Case study: trepanation or injury? An example of an early medieval skull from Płock (Poland)","authors":"Aleksandra Partynska, Daria Gromnicka","doi":"10.18778/1898-6773.85.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to analyze a skull found in ossuary material in Płock, dated between the 16th and 19th centuries. The skull was subjected to a comprehensive anthropological analysis due to the number of pathological changes occurring to it. These changes testify to both the diseases experienced by the individual and the acquired bone injuries. The study aimed to find out whether the pathological changes on the skull appeared as a result of the injury or intentional trepanation. The examined skull shows three injuries, of which only one may resemble trepanation processes. \nComparative analysis of the skull showed that the observed marks were generated ante-mortem. The presence of compact regenerated bone tissue with a significant thickness attests to this statement. Based on the trauma marks, it was determined that two of them (“A” and “B”) had been struck by a sharp-edged instrument. They do not, however, match any known trepanation techniques. They should be categorized as purposeful injuries that are not trepanations, based on the proportions and shape of the incisions, as well as the comparative study. The “C” trace, when examined and compared to the literature, appears to be an oval depression caused by an impact with a blunt-edged object rather than a healed trepanation mark.","PeriodicalId":39218,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.85.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze a skull found in ossuary material in Płock, dated between the 16th and 19th centuries. The skull was subjected to a comprehensive anthropological analysis due to the number of pathological changes occurring to it. These changes testify to both the diseases experienced by the individual and the acquired bone injuries. The study aimed to find out whether the pathological changes on the skull appeared as a result of the injury or intentional trepanation. The examined skull shows three injuries, of which only one may resemble trepanation processes. Comparative analysis of the skull showed that the observed marks were generated ante-mortem. The presence of compact regenerated bone tissue with a significant thickness attests to this statement. Based on the trauma marks, it was determined that two of them (“A” and “B”) had been struck by a sharp-edged instrument. They do not, however, match any known trepanation techniques. They should be categorized as purposeful injuries that are not trepanations, based on the proportions and shape of the incisions, as well as the comparative study. The “C” trace, when examined and compared to the literature, appears to be an oval depression caused by an impact with a blunt-edged object rather than a healed trepanation mark.
案例研究:穿孔还是受伤?来自Płock(波兰)的中世纪早期头骨标本
这项研究的目的是分析在Płock的骨骸材料中发现的一个头骨,该头骨的年代在16世纪到19世纪之间。由于发生了许多病理变化,因此对头骨进行了全面的人类学分析。这些变化既证明了个体所经历的疾病,也证明了获得性骨损伤。研究的目的是确定颅骨上的病理变化是由于损伤还是故意钻孔造成的。经检查的颅骨显示出三处损伤,其中只有一处可能类似于钻孔过程。颅骨对比分析表明,观察到的痕迹是死前产生的。具有显著厚度的致密再生骨组织的存在证明了这一说法。根据创伤痕迹,可以确定其中两人(" A "和" B ")被锋利的工具击中。然而,它们与任何已知的钻孔技术都不匹配。根据切口的比例和形状以及比较研究,应将其归类为非钻孔的有目的伤害。经过检查并与文献进行比较,“C”形痕迹似乎是由钝边物体撞击造成的椭圆形凹陷,而不是愈合的钻孔痕迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropological Review
Anthropological Review Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信