Thirty-five years of strategic management research. A country analysis using bibliometric techniques for the 1987-2021 period

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS
Nelson A. Andrade-Valbuena, Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández, J. Merigó
{"title":"Thirty-five years of strategic management research. A country analysis using bibliometric techniques for the 1987-2021 period","authors":"Nelson A. Andrade-Valbuena, Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández, J. Merigó","doi":"10.5295/cdg.211441na","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a significant field of study, thirty-five years of strategic management research has accumulated a substantial amount of knowledge. This bibliometric study explores whether the unlimited flow of knowledge and the globalization of education & research in this time period, could drive away (or deter) the identification and specific interest of research in phenomena of national importance. Using bibliometric techniques and visualization of similarities (VOS) procedures of citation and co-citation analyses, this Paper explores research trends at the country level over 35 years using data from the Web of Science database. The aims are to identify: 1) the most visible and prominent actors at the country, regional, and global-level; 2) the evolution of the subjects of research into strategic management at the country, global, and supra-regional level; and 3) the evolution of journals publishing strategic management research articles by location. Findings suggest that common research subjects coexist at higher levels of aggregation, establishing the “paradigm” or general agreement about the field’s boundaries. Additionally, findings show that at the country level, rather than following a global trend, there is an enduring diversification of research agendas that bow to national and supranational factors from geographically close places.","PeriodicalId":43351,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Gestion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Gestion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211441na","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As a significant field of study, thirty-five years of strategic management research has accumulated a substantial amount of knowledge. This bibliometric study explores whether the unlimited flow of knowledge and the globalization of education & research in this time period, could drive away (or deter) the identification and specific interest of research in phenomena of national importance. Using bibliometric techniques and visualization of similarities (VOS) procedures of citation and co-citation analyses, this Paper explores research trends at the country level over 35 years using data from the Web of Science database. The aims are to identify: 1) the most visible and prominent actors at the country, regional, and global-level; 2) the evolution of the subjects of research into strategic management at the country, global, and supra-regional level; and 3) the evolution of journals publishing strategic management research articles by location. Findings suggest that common research subjects coexist at higher levels of aggregation, establishing the “paradigm” or general agreement about the field’s boundaries. Additionally, findings show that at the country level, rather than following a global trend, there is an enduring diversification of research agendas that bow to national and supranational factors from geographically close places.
35年的战略管理研究。1987-2021年期间使用文献计量学技术的国家分析
作为一个重要的研究领域,三十五年的战略管理研究积累了大量的知识。这项文献计量学研究探讨了这一时期知识的无限流动和教育与研究的全球化是否会赶走(或阻止)对具有国家重要性的现象的认同和研究的特定兴趣。本文利用文献计量技术和引文和共引分析的相似性可视化(VOS)程序,利用科学网数据库中的数据,探讨了35年来国家层面的研究趋势。目标是确定:1)在国家、区域和全球各级最引人注目和最突出的行为者;2) 国家、全球和超区域层面战略管理研究主题的演变;以及3)期刊按地点发表战略管理研究文章的演变。研究结果表明,共同的研究主题在更高的聚合水平上共存,建立了关于该领域边界的“范式”或普遍共识。此外,研究结果表明,在国家一级,研究议程的长期多样化并没有遵循全球趋势,而是屈从于地理位置相近的国家和超国家因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信