An international perspective of the academic-practitioner divide in advertising: an exploratory study into its causes and solutions

IF 5.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
L. Ang, Cristian Buzeta, M. Hirose, M. J. V. van Loggerenberg, G. van Noort, R. Uribe, H. Voorveld
{"title":"An international perspective of the academic-practitioner divide in advertising: an exploratory study into its causes and solutions","authors":"L. Ang, Cristian Buzeta, M. Hirose, M. J. V. van Loggerenberg, G. van Noort, R. Uribe, H. Voorveld","doi":"10.1080/02650487.2022.2142416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In our international study of seven countries, we found that the academic-practitioner divide is as real today as it was three decades ago. The divide, which is more pronounced in some regions, is likely to worsen as society becomes more digitally complex, exacerbated by the lack of industry experience among young scholars entering academia in some quarters. Many bridging solutions were explored in this study, but the most important solution is for academia to produce relevant research, one that is useful for the industry. This should be widely and innovatively disseminated in a way that is easy to understand without dumbing it down. Practitioners generally do not like or know how to collaborate with academics, suggesting a need to develop a culture or mechanism that can raise awareness and foster mutual respect and trust between academia and industry. Bridging the divide will be challenging because of the existing academic reward structures. This situation needs to change. The discovery of two successful research institutes in the Netherlands and Australia shows how this divide can be bridged.","PeriodicalId":48111,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advertising","volume":"42 1","pages":"181 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2142416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In our international study of seven countries, we found that the academic-practitioner divide is as real today as it was three decades ago. The divide, which is more pronounced in some regions, is likely to worsen as society becomes more digitally complex, exacerbated by the lack of industry experience among young scholars entering academia in some quarters. Many bridging solutions were explored in this study, but the most important solution is for academia to produce relevant research, one that is useful for the industry. This should be widely and innovatively disseminated in a way that is easy to understand without dumbing it down. Practitioners generally do not like or know how to collaborate with academics, suggesting a need to develop a culture or mechanism that can raise awareness and foster mutual respect and trust between academia and industry. Bridging the divide will be challenging because of the existing academic reward structures. This situation needs to change. The discovery of two successful research institutes in the Netherlands and Australia shows how this divide can be bridged.
广告学界与实务界分歧的国际视角:对其成因及解决方法的探索性研究
摘要在我们对七个国家的国际研究中,我们发现学术从业者的分歧在今天和三十年前一样真实。这种分歧在一些地区更为明显,随着社会变得更加数字化复杂,这种分歧可能会加剧,而一些地区进入学术界的年轻学者缺乏行业经验,这种情况也会加剧。本研究探讨了许多桥接解决方案,但最重要的解决方案是学术界进行相关研究,这对行业有用。这应该以一种易于理解的方式广泛而创新地传播,而不会让它变得愚蠢。从业者通常不喜欢或不知道如何与学术界合作,这表明有必要发展一种文化或机制,以提高认识,促进学术界和工业界之间的相互尊重和信任。由于现有的学术奖励结构,弥合这种差距将是一项挑战。这种情况需要改变。荷兰和澳大利亚两个成功的研究机构的发现表明了如何弥合这一鸿沟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
19.40%
发文量
66
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信