{"title":"On the Possibility of Christian Philosophy","authors":"V. Belov, M. Ivleva, S. Nizhnikov","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt284x88.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the correlation between theology and philosophy and discusses the fundamental possibility of creating Christian philosophy. Historical and experimental theoretical grounds for the possibility of developing Christian philosophy within the framework of Catholicism, Protestantism, and Orthodoxy are consistently analyzed. On the basis of the historical and philosophical analogy, the authors trace the origin of those positions and approaches that have received their detailed substantiation and justification for the relationship with philosophy within these confessions. The problems on the way to the creation of Christian philosophy are revealed. The role of Christian philosophy in Catholicism is examined on the basis of the Thomist concept of the coexistence of theology and philosophy. The approach to the building of Christian philosophy from the standpoint of Protestantism is represented both by its radical branch and by its alternative cultural Protestantism. As the specific characteristics of the Eastern Christian knowledge of God the unity of the contemplative and activity-based path, spiritual cognition and theology are singled out. The importance for Orthodox thought of the apophatic way of cognition, the apophatics of the individual instead of the apothatics of the essence is emphasized (G. Palamas, V. Lossky, D. Staniloae). In the final statements, the authors come to the conclusion of the possibility of Christian philosophy in the Orthodox version, which is the possibility coordinated with Christian dogmatics, an experience of its living, and therefore reasonable comprehension.","PeriodicalId":43484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS AND IDEOLOGIES","volume":"18 1","pages":"17-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/j.ctt284x88.6","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS AND IDEOLOGIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt284x88.6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The article analyzes the correlation between theology and philosophy and discusses the fundamental possibility of creating Christian philosophy. Historical and experimental theoretical grounds for the possibility of developing Christian philosophy within the framework of Catholicism, Protestantism, and Orthodoxy are consistently analyzed. On the basis of the historical and philosophical analogy, the authors trace the origin of those positions and approaches that have received their detailed substantiation and justification for the relationship with philosophy within these confessions. The problems on the way to the creation of Christian philosophy are revealed. The role of Christian philosophy in Catholicism is examined on the basis of the Thomist concept of the coexistence of theology and philosophy. The approach to the building of Christian philosophy from the standpoint of Protestantism is represented both by its radical branch and by its alternative cultural Protestantism. As the specific characteristics of the Eastern Christian knowledge of God the unity of the contemplative and activity-based path, spiritual cognition and theology are singled out. The importance for Orthodox thought of the apophatic way of cognition, the apophatics of the individual instead of the apothatics of the essence is emphasized (G. Palamas, V. Lossky, D. Staniloae). In the final statements, the authors come to the conclusion of the possibility of Christian philosophy in the Orthodox version, which is the possibility coordinated with Christian dogmatics, an experience of its living, and therefore reasonable comprehension.
本文分析了神学与哲学的关系,探讨了基督教哲学创造的根本可能性。在天主教、新教和东正教的框架内发展基督教哲学的可能性的历史和实验理论基础得到了一致的分析。在历史和哲学类比的基础上,作者追溯了这些立场和方法的起源,这些立场和方法在这些忏悔中得到了详细的证实和与哲学的关系的理由。揭示了基督教哲学创造道路上的问题。基督教哲学在天主教中的作用是在神学和哲学共存的托马斯主义概念的基础上进行检验的。从新教的立场出发构建基督教哲学的途径,既有其激进分支,也有其另类文化的新教。作为东方基督教对上帝的认识的具体特征,冥想和活动为基础的路径,精神认知和神学的统一被挑出来。强调了正教思想的认知方式的重要性,强调了个体的认知而不是本质的认知(G. Palamas, V. Lossky, D. Staniloae)。在最后的陈述中,作者得出了东正教版本的基督教哲学的可能性的结论,这是与基督教教条协调的可能性,它的生活经验,因此是合理的理解。
期刊介绍:
The Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies is an international on-line publication of SCIRI (the Seminar for the Interdisciplinary Research of Religions and Ideologies) and SACRI (the Academic Society for the Research of Religions and Ideologies). It is a peer-review academic publication intended for professors and researchers interested in the study of religions and ideologies. J.S.R.I. encourages interdisciplinary approaches of religions, engaging the following domains: religious studies, philosophy of religions, ethics, political philosophy and political science, anthropology, sociology, interreligious dialogue and communications theory. All articles must explore the religious dimension of the issues covered. J.S.R.I. is an open-access journal published on the internet, with three issues per year. Publication in JSRI is completely free of charge.